Catalyst 3.8

jmke · 18th October 2003, 19:11

Quote:

I used the Cat 3.8's and the Omega 3.8s for a short time after they were released to the public. I noticed a dramatic system temp increase. It went from around 28 degrees to 39 after half hour playing the call of duty demo. I wasn't satisfied with this, and as this was the ONLY reason for my temp increase I decided to roll-back to the Omega 3.7's. I did so and within half hour my temps were back to normal. Go figure. There is *definitely* something odd going on there.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...threadid=20906

piotke · 18th October 2003, 22:01

serious problem !

Gamer · 18th October 2003, 22:09

uninstalled them.

don't know if it's true, but you never know.

jmke · 18th October 2003, 22:23

Quote:

With Radeon 9800/9700's capable of syncing @ a refresh rate of 200 Hz, that means 99% of the world's monitors are at risk of damage.

So far, a total of 183 monitors, ranging from high-end 22" Viewsonic P225F's to lowly 14" Compaq SVGA monitors have been reported as dead/damaged due to this problem. It is to be taken seriously.

18th October 2003, 22:31

does that count for tft's alsow??

greetz

jmke · 18th October 2003, 22:41

wrong refresh rates for TFT's is also bad, so I think yes

19th October 2003, 08:48

omfg crap .. I guess I'll go uninstall them now

and reinstall when it's fixed or something .. Or would the Omega drivers fix this issue ?

jmke · 19th October 2003, 12:06

the Omega drivers are based on the ATI ones and have the same core code.. so in short: don't use them either

The Senile Doctor · 19th October 2003, 13:04

i haven't noticed anything, probably the pelt is keeping things as they should, muy overclock rests at 470/760 or sth.

I ain't changing, I live on the wild side

19th October 2003, 14:44

you're just looking for an excuse to buy new hardware :grin:

18th October 2003, 22:01	#2
piotke [M] Reviewer Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 4,997	serious problem ! __________________ .

18th October 2003, 22:09	#3
Gamer [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,582	uninstalled them. don't know if it's true, but you never know. __________________

18th October 2003, 22:41	#6
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,419	wrong refresh rates for TFT's is also bad, so I think yes __________________

19th October 2003, 12:06	#8
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,419	the Omega drivers are based on the ATI ones and have the same core code.. so in short: don't use them either __________________

19th October 2003, 13:04	#9
The Senile Doctor [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is Posts: 3,171	i haven't noticed anything, probably the pelt is keeping things as they should, muy overclock rests at 470/760 or sth. I ain't changing, I live on the wild side __________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world

18th October 2003, 22:31	#5
Da_BoKa Posts: n/a	does that count for tft's alsow?? greetz

19th October 2003, 08:48	#7
SpoBo Posts: n/a	omfg crap .. I guess I'll go uninstall them now and reinstall when it's fixed or something .. Or would the Omega drivers fix this issue ?

19th October 2003, 14:44	#10
anes Posts: n/a	you're just looking for an excuse to buy new hardware :grin:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
AMD Releases Catalyst 10.4a Preview	jmke	WebNews	0	22nd April 2010 15:02
ATI Catalyst 9.9 Drivers Released	jmke	WebNews	0	12th September 2009 15:18
ATI Catalyst 9.8 driver available for download	jmke	WebNews	0	15th August 2009 07:41
ATI Catalyst 9.6 vs 9.5 vs 9.4 Performance Compared	jmke	WebNews	0	11th June 2009 21:38
ATI Catalyst 5.7 Driver comparison	jmke	WebNews	0	19th July 2005 08:36
Catalyst Roundup 2005	jmke	WebNews	1	18th May 2005 16:15
ATI Catalyst Tweak Guide Updated	jmke	WebNews	0	8th April 2005 16:09
Catalyst 5.3 Out	jmke	WebNews	0	10th March 2005 12:06
Catalyst 4.12 Driver Comparison	jmke	WebNews	0	14th December 2004 10:16
Catalyst 4.12 Out	jmke	WebNews	0	14th December 2004 10:03