It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Cat's out of the Bag: Intel Nehalem Benchmarked Cat's out of the Bag: Intel Nehalem Benchmarked
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Cat's out of the Bag: Intel Nehalem Benchmarked
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 5th June 2008, 10:24   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,001
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Cat's out of the Bag: Intel Nehalem Benchmarked

We had access to a 2.66GHz Nehalem for the longest time, unfortunately the motherboard it was paired with had some serious issues with memory performance. Not only was there no difference between single and triple channel memory configurations, memory latency was high. We know this was a board specific issue since our second Nehalem platform didn't exhibit any issues. Unfortunately we didn't have access to the more mature platform for very long at all, meaning the majority of our tests had to be run on the first setup (never fear, Nehalem is fast enough that it didn't end up mattering).

We've been told to expect a 20 - 30% overall advantage over Penryn and it looks like Intel is on track to delivering just that in Q4. At 2.66GHz, Nehalem is already faster than the fastest 3.2GHz Penryns on the market today. At 3.2GHz, I'd feel comfortable calling it baby Skulltrail in all but the most heavily threaded benchmarks. This thing is fast and this is on a very early platform, keep in mind that Nehalem doesn't launch in Q4 of this year.

http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/int...spx?i=3326&p=1
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 5th June 2008 at 10:32.
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2008, 21:37   #2
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I was right about the performance, but so wrong about the heat... I was so expecting a bit more heat than just a paltry 15 watts clock for clock.

Single-core Cinebench R10 test shows a 25% performance gain over Penryn, and that was with single-channel memory verses dual-channel for Penryn.

Since they tested with DDR3-1067 RAM, will be interesting to test some 1333MHz RAM with 6-6-6-18 timings. Suspect latency will decrease further and might show some small performance gains ontop of everything else.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Plans 10W Nehalem CPU jmke WebNews 0 5th February 2009 17:17
Intel Nehalem also has a TLB bug jmke WebNews 1 1st December 2008 20:29
Power gating and turbo mode: Intel talks Nehalem at IDF jmke WebNews 0 20th August 2008 16:04
Intel Nehalem CPU B1 Stepping Photo jmke WebNews 0 18th August 2008 17:19
Intel Nehalem 3rd Party Heatsink Pictured jmke WebNews 0 18th August 2008 11:45
Intel Nehalem to be released as Core i7 CPUs jmke WebNews 0 8th August 2008 16:42
Intel Nehalem Socket 1366 Motherboards Emerge at Computex 2008 jmke WebNews 0 8th June 2008 11:42
Intel won't let Nvidia make Nehalem chipsets jmke WebNews 4 7th June 2008 13:19
Opening the Kimono: Intel Details Nehalem and Tempts with Larrabee jmke WebNews 0 18th March 2008 17:14
All Intel Nehalem CPUs not created equally jmke WebNews 4 28th November 2007 17:35

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:26.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO