Sidney

As we can see at high details with a definitely above average test system, Battlefield 2 is quite intense on performance. While it is definitely more than playable, we believe more accurate game play results from another perspective would be slightly slower than the results we obtained. Hopefully DICE will add a true benchmark feature to the final game but given what they've done previously that doesn't seem likely.

http://www.amdzone.com/modules.php?o...tid=145&page=1

__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

Rutar

looks like ATI cards own in this one with AA and AF

x850XT PE vs 6800GT :/


But look at the AA and AF ownage of the X800XL, it creamed the 6800GT =O


tough, the FPS indicate that it probably is only playable in 1024x768 8xAF with the newestr cards

DUR0N

The DICE boys aren't very good programmers, that is know since BF1942.
Not saying their games are full of bugs, but they sure could be optimised.

jmke

when a game crashes to desktop, I would not call it stable

I can run Q3A loops for weeks, that's stable.

__________________

DUR0N

BF1942 and Vietnam were stable. BF2Demo is still in beta fase, like many demo's. Still, never seen it crash here.