 |  |  |  |  |
ATI's New Leader in Graphics Performance: The Radeon X1900 Series
| |||||||||
|
ATI's New Leader in Graphics Performance: The Radeon X1900 Series
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
27th January 2006, 09:58
| #1 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
 | ATI's New Leader in Graphics Performance: The Radeon X1900 Series The numbers really do speak for themselves: the X1900XTX is an incredible part. In the end, the difference in performance between the X1900XT and XTX versions was so small that it's hard for us to see how anyone could justify spending another hundred dollars to have someone at a factory eke out that extra little bit of performance. ATI's justification for the X1900 XTX is that it is a pre-overclocked X1900 XT with a $100 manufacturers stamp of approval.
__________________  |
|  |
|
27th January 2006, 10:42
| #2 | |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
|  Quote:
the BF2 test without AA even shows noticable drops in framerate, anything over 1280x???? sees frame rates which drop below 60 mark. If games are CPU limited we would not see large performance drops increasing resolutions. increase in resolution = higher taxing on VGA if CPU was limiting factor, FPS score would be ~ the same when increasing resolution. They just debunked their own statement with their own benchmark numbers...
__________________ | |
|
| |
|
27th January 2006, 11:01
| #3 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| those look like playable frame rates... [attachment] or not.
__________________ |
|
| |
|
27th January 2006, 11:11
| #4 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| Anandtech CPU <> GPU limit Battlefield 2: GPU limited (max graphical detail = ~60FPS at 1280x????) Black & White 2: GPU limited (max detail = ~30FPS at 1280x????) Day of Defeat: GPU limited (they say CPU... but look at the score 77/54/40/35FPS scales resolution) FarCry: GPU limit (max detail = ~36FPS at 1280x????) FEAR: GPU limit (max detail = ~70FPS at 1280x???? .. scales 70/50/38/36) SplinterCell: GPU (74/57/43/38) Quake 4: GPU (73/58/45/42) where is that CPU limited game? I give you one: www.liveforspeed.net
__________________ |
|
| |
|
27th January 2006, 11:12
| #5 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
 | unbelievable...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
27th January 2006, 11:28
| #6 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,022
| the performance of the cards? their statement? the graph.. what? :-)
__________________ |
|
| |
|
27th January 2006, 14:17
| #7 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| the statement, it suxx, cannot believe anandtech writes this kind of crap 
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Connect3D Radeon X1900 GT graphics card | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th September 2006 22:42 |
| New ATI Radeon X1950 will not replace X1900 Series | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 4th August 2006 12:48 |
| Sapphire Radeon X1900 GT | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th May 2006 17:21 |
| GeCube Radeon X1900 XTX Graphics Card | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 20th April 2006 09:37 |
| Image Quality on the Radeon X1900 Series | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 7th March 2006 16:56 |
| ATI's Add-in-Card Partners Launch RADEON X550 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 20th June 2005 19:57 |
| Enthusiasts get top 3DMark05 scores with ATI's graphics cards | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 1st October 2004 10:29 |
| Graphics Cards Makers Change Plans on Affordable RADEON 9800 XT | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 8th April 2004 15:50 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
