![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #1 | |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,002
![]() | Quote:
__________________ ![]() Last edited by jmke : 14th September 2009 at 14:45. | |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,002
![]() | Here are a few HIGH resolution pics of the HD 5870 some interesting comments on the pics: Quote:
more benchies: ![]() ![]()
__________________ ![]() Last edited by jmke : 14th September 2009 at 14:48. | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
![]() | "Someone calculated that the steps on the vertical axis are 20% (except for the first one which must be 100%). If AMD had chosen 5% for each step, the HD 5870 would have looked even more impressive. Good card. Stupid Graph." Graph is LOL |
| | |
| | #4 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
![]() | That graph is the most misleading I've seen in quite a while. Looks like 5870 would double or more the fps compared to 285, which clearly is NOT the case. Thanks MM for the clarification. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,002
![]() | yes the chart without the X axis starting at zero makes it a bit weird; it does show the GTX 285 is being outperformed in all the games listed, and more so when higher AA is enabeld. the last two charts added above here ^ should give a more realistic view. either way; it will be a close battle, if HD 5870 is $299 and GTX 285 remains at $299 also http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&q=Geforce+GTX+285
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,002
![]() | Quote:
GTX 285: 54 HD 5870 : 109 109/2 = 54.5 = more than double ![]()
__________________ ![]() | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
![]() | Those numbers can't be right; there must be something wrong with either the nvidia or ati results. It's always like this: "next-gen owns current gen by doubling performance" ... never turns out to be the complete truth. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,002
![]() | Well, the numbers for GTX 285 are about right, between 50-60fps at 1920x1200 4xAA/16xAF; numbers for HD 4870 X2 are too high, should be lower, also 50-60fps. Single HD 4890 sucks in HAWX... 28fps, in that chart it's faster than GTX 285... source: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid..._13.html#sect2
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
| | #9 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
![]() | I think that says it all ![]() |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,002
![]() | here another source with HAWX 1920x1200 4xAA/16xAF http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/g....W.X,1337.html GTX 285: 58.90 HD 4890: 37.90 HD 4870X2: 63.90
__________________ ![]() |
| | |
![]() |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ATI Radeon HD 5870 & 5970 with NVIDIA PhysX | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 11th June 2010 18:44 |
| ATI Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity delayed to end of March? | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 5th March 2010 16:46 |
| ATI Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity6 Edition Slated for March 11 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th February 2010 16:12 |
| ATI Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity Edition "Available for Sale" | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 19th January 2010 11:32 |
| Find the Best CPU for a Single ATI Radeon HD 5870 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 CrossFireX | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 11th December 2009 16:00 |
| Sapphire ATI Radeon HD 5870 Video Card Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th October 2009 09:12 |
| Intel Core i7 Benchmarks Hit The Web | jmke | WebNews | 5 | 20th August 2008 11:18 |
| Driver Heaven Mobility Modder.net Public Beta V 0.8.1.0 - XP and Vista Support | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 22nd June 2007 12:19 |
| ATI RADEON X1900 series benchmarks? | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 11th January 2006 20:31 |
| ATI Response to Doom 3 Benchmarks | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th July 2004 08:13 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |