| Thread Tools |
26th August 2008, 09:30 | #11 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| well... this is weird; don't know what to make of this: by renaming the .exe name they boost the performance of Furmark and ET:QW; although in their 8.8 vs 8.7 comparo there was no difference; so only at low resolutions this might have an impact? a negligible impact at best...
__________________ |
26th August 2008, 22:20 | #12 |
Posts: n/a
| Remember how changing the name would affect memory performance scores for Futuremark Vantage? Could be the same thing, different, more optimized compiler is used instead? Would be unlikely that ATI Profiles would hinder performance that much when supposed to do the opposite... |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ATI Catalyst 9.8 driver available for download | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 15th August 2009 07:41 |
ATI Catalyst 9.5 vs 9.4 Performance Test | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 22nd May 2009 08:07 |
ATI Catalyst 9.2 Delivers Nice Performance Boost | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 23rd February 2009 16:29 |
ATI Catalyst 9.1 Driver: Performance Express-Test | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 30th January 2009 13:43 |
ATI Catalyst 8.9 vs 8.8 vs 8.7 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 19th September 2008 17:24 |
ATI Catalyst 8.8 Officially Released | jmke | WebNews | 3 | 21st August 2008 09:04 |
ATI Catalyst 8.8 vs 8.7 Performance Comparison | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 21st August 2008 08:52 |
Crossfire performance in Vista with Catalyst 8.7 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 24th July 2008 08:37 |
AMD Releases ATI Catalyst 8.7 Graphics Driver Package | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 21st July 2008 20:40 |
ATI Catalyst 7.10 Drivers to Improve FPS Performance | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 10th October 2007 10:15 |
Thread Tools | |
| |