| ||Thread Tools|
|25th July 2012, 07:25||#1|
Join Date: May 2010
Apple and Samsung blasted by a judge
An Aussie judge has given Apple and Samsung a cuff around their lugholes for wasting the court's time with their silly patent tiff.
According to the Sydney Morning Herald, Federal Court Justice Annabelle Bennett said that the pair's patent dispute over wireless transmission technology was "ridiculous" and might be best settled in mediation.
Samsung sued Apple, claiming the maker of iPhones is infringing three patents covering data transmission over the 3G wireless spectrum. The suit was in response to Apple's claim that Samsung stole its design ideas for computer tablets and phones.
But the move did not impress Bennett who wanted to know why "on earth are these proceedings going ahead? It's ridiculous".
Samsung said that the problem was that after Apple obeyed its late CEO's orders to "go thermonuclear" on Samsung for nicking the ideas he had nicked from someone else, Jobs' Mob forgot to pay Samsung a licence fee for the technology that allows phones to conduct multiple tasks including taking calls while uploading photos to the internet.
Apple told the court that it was willing to pay but Samsung refused, so ner.
Bennett wanted to know why she should not order the parties to go to mediation and has given the two sides a week to come up with a good reason to proceed with the hearing.
The reasons will probably be along the likes of "he started it" and "because they smell".
The two have tried mediation before, but were unable to resolve their religious differences. Apple really believes it invented everything, and Samsung stole it. Samsung believes that it has the right to defend itself by using patents it would normally give out cheaply.
But Bennett seems to have twigged that it is all part of a big legal game which is not really doing much other than trying to harm the other side.
When one of the pair tried to hold separate trials on Apple's and Samsung's claims she told the pleader to sling his hook, presumably because it would just ratchet up the theatre, put a few lawyers' kids through university and do nothing else to help humanity.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Judge calls Samsung vs. Apple 3G suit 'ridiculous,' suggests mediation instead||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||24th July 2012 08:03|
|Samsung Galaxy S III blasted with X-ray, doesn't gain superpowers||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||23rd July 2012 09:02|
|Apple forced to say sorry to Samsung||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||20th July 2012 07:22|
|UK judge forces Apple to state on its site that Samsung didn't copy the iPad||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||19th July 2012 08:46|
|Judge orders Apple & Samsung to reveal more documents||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||19th July 2012 07:58|
|Slide-to-unlock is 'obvious', rules Apple patent judge||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||6th July 2012 07:46|
|Apple wins US battle against Samsung||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||27th June 2012 12:17|
|Judge dismisses Apple vs. Motorola in its entirety, companies unable to prove damages||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||25th June 2012 08:54|
|Judge puts Apple vs. Motorola hearing back on deck||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||15th June 2012 08:14|
|Apple loses against Samsung down-under||Stefan Mileschin||WebNews||0||2nd December 2011 10:57|