AMD's 65nm - The Plot Thickens

jmke · 21st December 2006, 15:02

Although they won't be available until sometime next year, a closer look at AMD's 65nm lineup reveals an interesting fact. Until recently, AMD would differentiate between subsequent model numbers by clock speed and cache size, alternating between the two. So while the Athlon 64 X2 4600+ and 4800+ both ran at 2.4GHz, the latter had twice the L2 cache per core at 1MB. After Intel's Core 2 launch, AMD killed all non-FX 1MB L2 parts, resulting in a processor lineup that was mostly segregated according to clock speed. (Of course they then added the X2 5200+ and 5600+ back into the mix....) With the move to 65nm, AMD is once again introducing model numbers that it had killed off before, but without playing with L2 cache sizes; instead, AMD is breaking with recent tradition and implementing non-integer clock multipliers for these "new" in-between speeds

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2893

21st December 2006, 21:20

they pulled a prescott

jmke · 21st December 2006, 22:20

without the heat, hard to do

21st December 2006, 15:02	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	AMD's 65nm - The Plot Thickens Although they won't be available until sometime next year, a closer look at AMD's 65nm lineup reveals an interesting fact. Until recently, AMD would differentiate between subsequent model numbers by clock speed and cache size, alternating between the two. So while the Athlon 64 X2 4600+ and 4800+ both ran at 2.4GHz, the latter had twice the L2 cache per core at 1MB. After Intel's Core 2 launch, AMD killed all non-FX 1MB L2 parts, resulting in a processor lineup that was mostly segregated according to clock speed. (Of course they then added the X2 5200+ and 5600+ back into the mix....) With the move to 65nm, AMD is once again introducing model numbers that it had killed off before, but without playing with L2 cache sizes; instead, AMD is breaking with recent tradition and implementing non-integer clock multipliers for these "new" in-between speeds http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=2893 __________________

21st December 2006, 22:20	#3
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	without the heat, hard to do __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
AMD's 65nm GPU: why the future of GPUs is smaller, faster, cooler	jmke	WebNews	1	13th April 2007 01:29
Meet AMD's 65nm R600 - the R650	jmke	WebNews	2	11th April 2007 22:50
Plot Thickens Around Google's Alleged Mobile Phone Plans	jmke	WebNews	0	8th March 2007 11:16
AMD's 65nm L2 cache looks to be slower	jmke	WebNews	0	22nd December 2006 17:30
A quick look at AMD's 65nm Athlon 64 X2 processors	jmke	WebNews	0	20th December 2006 11:18
AMD's 65nm Brisbane Core Previewed: The most energy efficient AMD CPU to date	jmke	WebNews	0	18th December 2006 07:45
AMD's 65nm dual-core Athlons to debut 5 December?	jmke	WebNews	0	27th November 2006 19:02
Intel Develops "Ultra-Low Power" 65nm Manufacturing Process	jmke	WebNews	0	22nd September 2005 21:59
Valve Half Life 2 plot thickens: Expansion pack Details	jmke	WebNews	0	11th April 2005 15:56

21st December 2006, 21:20	#2
Rutar Posts: n/a	they pulled a prescott