 |  |  |  |  |
AMD R600XTX Benchmark Result Leaked
| |||||||||
|
AMD R600XTX Benchmark Result Leaked
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
21st March 2007, 20:01
| #1 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
 |  AMD R600XTX Benchmark Result Leaked We got hold of some preliminary benchmarks figures of the R600 XTX card with core clock at 800MHz vs a GeForce 8800 GTX card. Using a Core 2 Extreme 2.93GHz processor on an Intel 975X board, the 3DMark06 score at 1600x1200 resolution is 97xx on the R600XTX compared to 95xx on the 8800GTX. http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4830
__________________  |
|  |
|
21st March 2007, 20:57
| #2 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
 | Seems disappointing at first. Then again, at 1600x1200, this result might be CPU limited (with the dual core).
__________________  |
|
| |
|
21st March 2007, 22:56
| #3 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| default 06 res is 1280x1024, this doesn't seem CPU limited 
__________________ |
|
| |
|
22nd March 2007, 09:29
| #4 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| r600xtx is sloooooow 
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
22nd March 2007, 10:10
| #5 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| in my humble opinion, 200 3DMark points will be less than 5FPS in games, and that with a card which consumes 270W on its own? let's wait and see for final driver game benchmarks
__________________ |
|
| |
|
22nd March 2007, 12:10
| #6 |
|
Posts: n/a
| well, it won't consume that much because it is on 65nm now |
| |
|
22nd March 2007, 12:33
| #7 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| let's just wait and see Prescott was also 65nm...
__________________ |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
