| Thread Tools |
25th January 2006, 18:16 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| AMD and Intel CPU roundup: 40 processors compared! Based on the fact that our regular processor tests focus on innovations or high end products, we decided to write this article to give you an overall view of AMD and Intel processor performances. We compared 22 processors from the Santa Clara giant and 18 from the father of the Athlon.
__________________ |
25th January 2006, 18:18 | #2 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| my S754 3000+ is still good for gaming
__________________ |
25th January 2006, 18:20 | #3 | |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Quote:
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II | |
25th January 2006, 18:20 | #4 |
Posts: n/a
| no minimum FPS compares for the games I can't rely on the old firingsquad article all the time to show the benefits of 1 MB cache. |
25th January 2006, 18:22 | #5 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Computer has more than a single function, mind you.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
25th January 2006, 18:25 | #6 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| it's impossible to dish this roundup; lack of a min. FPS does not make this article less interesting
__________________ |
25th January 2006, 18:29 | #7 |
Posts: n/a
| yes, but for testing a processor for gaming the min FPS are important |
25th January 2006, 18:54 | #8 |
Posts: n/a
| It says it gives an overall view of AMD and Intel processors. |
Thread Tools | |
| |