Which 22 inch to choose? Six monitors tested with reaction times from 2 to 5 ms
 

We already tested the Acer AL2216W, and now it’s back. We also added to the list the Asus MW221u, Belinea 2225 S1W, HP w22, Fujitsu-Siemens L22-1W and Samsung SyncMaster 225BW.

Besides their price, they stand out with an additional VGA interface (which is always available), various designs, plastic or metal bezels and more or less accurate color rendering. There is also the "Zero dead pixel" policy on one of the screens, which is very much appreciated and an intelligent option.

(Thanks Rutar for the link ;) )http://www.behardware.com/articles/6...2-to-5-ms.html

behardware is my stable source for monitors

If your monitor isn't on behardware, it's not getting bought or recommended by me.

is my 20" Dell screen on there? ;)
http://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/s...ad.php?t=23750

surely kicks ***:)

http://www.behardware.com/articles/6...6-8-16-ms.html

even including a nice cherry picker notice for Dell


But you CANNOT recommend a 20" nowadays to ANY user because 22" is the new hotness with a good balance of resolution, size and price.

only if I can get 22" in NONE widescreen configuration :)

the Dell at Behardware is the 2007WP, mine is 2001FP , none widescreen ftw

there is nothing wrong with widescreen

depends on your personal preference & appearantly jmke doesnt like widescreens, so...

also, keep this in mind:

for movies, agreed

for EVERYTHING else, I much prefer same sized 4:3 aspect ratio screen, just do the math

1600x1200
1680x1050

Widescreen gives you less desktop real estate

i wouldnt say less, but different.

anyway, just take a peak at the picture i posted, should point out some differences in size & how the proportions lay compared to eachother.

well, a 22 WS is a very attractive size compared to a 20" 5:4