It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Which 22 inch to choose? Six monitors tested with reaction times from 2 to 5 ms Which 22 inch to choose? Six monitors tested with reaction times from 2 to 5 ms
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Which 22 inch to choose? Six monitors tested with reaction times from 2 to 5 ms
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 22nd January 2007, 22:35   #11
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

should compare same sizes of course

@SuAside

1680x1050: 1764000
1600x1200: 1920000

~8% less pixels and resolution.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2007, 22:51   #12
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Widescreen gaming is very cool too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2007, 08:51   #13
SuAside
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
@SuAside
1680x1050: 1764000
1600x1200: 1920000
~8% less pixels and resolution.
I know that pixelwise the difference is there, but i'm saying it's not as simple.

but it is also true that is it more natural for humans to have a widerscreen due to our field of view, but most computer interfaces simply do not take advantage of that, even when displayed on widescreens.

hence it's a simple personal preference that takes the upperhand, not simple math or medical logic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2007, 09:48   #14
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

I never said it wasn't personal favor I'm just throwing some numbers into the mix
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2007, 14:09   #15
HitenMitsurugi
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutar View Post
But you CANNOT recommend a 20" nowadays to ANY user because 22" is the new hotness with a good balance of resolution, size and price.
Bleh 22" is TN, I don't like TN.

20" it iz for me!

As for widescreen or not.. 4:3/5:4 are usually more expensive or do not boast the same specs, when you go to 20" or higher. So bought me a widescreen. The Viewsonic VP2030b has some very nice specs, and would have bought that one, if only it wasn't €150 more expensive than it's widescreen brother (VX2025wm). The dell is cheap enough but its specs are sub par.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
XFX HD5870 2 GB Eyefinity6 with 6 monitors - the ultimate gaming experience? jmke WebNews 0 30th June 2010 14:15
Samsung and Dell 30inch LCD Widescreen Monitors jmke WebNews 0 18th April 2007 08:26
Matrox TripleHead2Go Tested jmke WebNews 1 30th May 2006 09:28
Q4'04 LCD Desktop Monitors Rise 26% Q/Q Reaching $8.2B in Revenues jmke WebNews 0 30th March 2005 11:47
Monitors - LCD vs. CRT Sidney WebNews 0 18th January 2005 03:15
How To Setup And Run Dual LCD Monitors jmke WebNews 0 11th October 2004 14:32
LCD Monitors vs CRT Monitors @ PC Review jmke WebNews 0 25th May 2004 09:37

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:44.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO