Rutar

Patch 1.04: 88 FPS

Patch 1.05 without SMP support: 107 FPS

Patch 1.05 with SMP support: 178 FPS



of course, lowest graphic settings to avoid GPU bottleneck (x1800XT @ default)

easypanic

Any graphs?

Link to news?

__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\||____
|....The BEER TRUCK.... ||||'""|""°\_,__
|___Just for You___l||__|__|___|) _____|
|(@)(@)""""""""""""**|(@)(@)****|(@)|

Rutar

um, I did it myself :O


I wished it would show the timedemo results more like the ones from fear but this is as good as it gets

easypanic

Always put your source in your post.

This could be a nice [M] article .

__________________
|^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\||____
|....The BEER TRUCK.... ||||'""|""°\_,__
|___Just for You___l||__|__|___|) _____|
|(@)(@)""""""""""""**|(@)(@)****|(@)|

Rutar

it's more yay dualcore works for games post =O

but indeed it would be nice to actually get minimum FPS results

jmke

I know that removing the GPU bottle neck is the ideal way to test things, it's also interesting to see if it makes a difference when you run the benchmark at playable settings (1024x768 and higher with FSAA/AF)

for min FPS you can use www.fraps.com and benchmark hotkey

__________________

Rutar

I get 53 FPS with 1600x1200 4x adaptive AA and 16x HQ AF. Doesn't change with SMP command line, but dam it looks nice.

Rutar

min FPS are constant, I guess GPU limited

need a faster card =O


with only 2xAA and above settings, min FPS are 38 o_O

The Senile Doctor

that's the reason why I don't plan to get any friggin new cpu for another 2 years
my fx53 is 2 years old and it doesn't make any difference when you have dualcore/3.0ghz if the thing is gpu limited at 1920*1200...

__________________
OC-2-the-death
Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent
Doom over the world

jmke

at 1920*1200 it'll be a while before your system will stop being GPU limited

__________________