It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Hardware Madness > General Madness - System Building Advice
CORSAIR Force GS 240GB Single Drive and Raid0 SSD Performance Guide CORSAIR Force GS 240GB Single Drive and Raid0 SSD Performance Guide
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


CORSAIR Force GS 240GB Single Drive and Raid0 SSD Performance Guide
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 24th January 2013, 23:28   #1
Eastern OC Expert
 
windwithme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,000
windwithme Freshly Registered
Default CORSAIR Force GS 240GB Single Drive and Raid0 SSD Performance Guide



Solid-State Drive does improve C performance in past 4 years.
No matter DeskTop PC or Notebook both shorten the system processing time.
It?s why SSD still so popular after launching many years. However, the high price also impact the popularity.

Every year, SSD price is almost 50% off. The price segment is based on 100 or 200USD.
As history price record, 2 years ago, 200USD only could have 60GB, last year was 120GB and this year is 240GB.
This year, you can find many 120GB SSD below 100USD. This price point is acceptable.

3 years ago, CORSAIR, from USA, started their SSD product line which was pioneer in this field.
Controller also moved from SAMSUNG to SandForce or Marvell.
Different controller focus on different performance and price segment.

This GS SSD is Force Series. It had Force 3 and GT, 2 versions.
Force Series uses SandForce controller with different NAND Flash ICs.
Let?s look at packing first. Gold is a representative color of GS.


Contents
Left side is product warranty card, middle is Force GS 240GB and right side is back 2.5? to 3.5? rack and screws.


Product size is 2.5?. The capacity is 240GB.,Official max speed is 555/525 MB/s at ATTO Disk Benchmark.
Random 4K max write is 90k IOPS. It?s very high specs of 4K performance in current SSD market.


Metal shell with red coating and tactile impression is grain texture.
CORSAIR offers 3 years warranty. The family has 128/180/240/360/480GB.
Capacity provides rich choices. Users can choose the suitable one by budget or demand.


Back is black metal with matte hair line. It improves the product texture.
Lower left is SATA3 and power connectors. Next is silver laser sticker.
As warranty and internal hardware safety, we better to keep it in original state.


Force Series GS uses popular SandForce SF-2281 controller.
NAND Flash uses 16 SanDisk Mark 24nm ICs, 16GB each.
If you are interested in Force GS internal build, you can search in Google.

The test platform is Intel Z77 chipset, GIGABYTE G1.SNIPER M3.
It?s mid-end gaming series using Micro ATX. It emphasizes audio and LAN chips.
It equips Creative latest CA0132, quad-core audio processor. It supports THX, CRYSTAL VOICE, and etc.


It has 3 PCI-E X16, 1 PCI-E X1. The expandability is very good as Micro ATX form factor.
Also Intel chipset IO performance is better. The SATA3 should have better performance in SSD.


System Configuration
CPU: Intel Core i5-3570K
MB: GIGABYTE G1.SNIPER M3
DRAM: CORSAIR DOMINATOR-GT 1866 8GBX2
VGA: Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD: SanDisk Extreme 240GB / WD 1TB 7200rpm
POWER: Thermaltake TR2 600W
Cooler: XIGMATEK HDT-S1283
OS: Windows8 Ultimate 64bit


Single SanDisk Extreme 240GB install at white SATA3 port
None OS system drive without any data. Test at Intel Z77 platform.
HD Tune Pro 5.00
Black Size is the special part of this software. Left side default is 64K and right side is 1MB.
64K - Read - Average 408.7 MB/s Access Time 0.116ms
1MB - Read - Average 521.3 MB/s Access Time 0.117ms


HD Tune Pro 5.00 set Black Size as 1MB almost reaching the best performance.
windwithme is offline  
Old 24th January 2013, 23:32   #2
Eastern OC Expert
 
windwithme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,000
windwithme Freshly Registered
Default

64K - Write - Average 336.7 MB/s Access Time 0.143ms
1MB - Write - Average 331.4 MB/s Access Time 0.108ms


Read - Random Access & Extra tests


Write - Random Access & Extra tests


File Benchmark
Sequential 4KB randon Read - 66732 IOPS / Write - 91984 IOPS
ATTO DISK Benchmark over 512KB test, max read is 557.9 Mb/s and max write is 535.6 MB/s


CrystalDiskMark
Seq Read - 524.1 MB/s Write - 288.7 MB/s
<All 0xFF, 0Fill> Read - 527.4 MB/s Write - 524.9 MB/s
<All 0x00, 1Fill> Read - 527.6 MB/s Write - 525.1 MB/s


CrystalDiskMark default test is random. You can see right side performance is lower.
It?s characteristic of SandForce controller. It has lower performance in random algorithm.
Left pic is CrystalDiskMark sequential mode. The write performance is close to official specs.

AS SSD Benchmark - 811
Seq Read - 519.43 MB/s Write - 274.13 MB/s
4K - 64Thrd Read - 224.70 MB/s Write - 214.04 MB/s


AS SSD Benchmark Seq Write is similar to CrystalDiskMark.
Compression Benchmark write starts from 280MB/s to over 480MB/s.
SandForce in Sequential Write uses special algorithm, this is key weakness of SandForce controller.
In sequential or random read, 4K performance and continuous write, SF-2281 controller is very good.

PCMark Vantage - HDD Score : 78671
CrystalMark Sequential Read 503.02 MB/s Sequential Write 500.48 MB/s


IOMETER 2008
1 minute - 100% Read / 100% Random 4KB
Total I/Os per Second => 55773.68


3 minutes - 100% Read / 100% Random 4KB
Total I/Os per Second => 56190.92


1 minute - 100% Write / 100% Random 4KB
Total I/Os per Second => 91791.99
windwithme is offline  
Old 24th January 2013, 23:36   #3
Eastern OC Expert
 
windwithme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,000
windwithme Freshly Registered
Default

3 minutes - 100% Write / 100% Random 4KB
Total I/Os per Second => 91553.28


The former review of SandForce SSD, the performance is lower after 3 minutes. It may be caused by firmware.
As GS using SandForce controller, IOMETER 2008 Random Read / Write 4KB test are very good.
1 minute and 3 minutes test difference is minor. You can treat it as acceptable deviation.

SSD Benchmark TOTAL => 5026.30


This result is much higher than 3700 by Marvell 88SS9174-BKK2 controller SS.
You can see SandForce controller SSD still has his advantage in some software.

Second part is two 240GB GS runs at Raid 0 mode.


Two CORSAIR Force GS 240GB both install at white SATA3 port.
None OS system drive without any data. Test at Intel Z77 platform.
HD Tune Pro 5.00
Black Size is the special part of this software. Left side default is 64K and right side is 8MB.
64K - Read - Average 1028.7 MB/s Access Time 0.123ms
8MB - Read - Average 1040.1 MB/s Access Time 0.122ms


64K - Write - Average 325.8 MB/s Access Time 0.094ms
8MB - Write - Average 891.9 MB/s Access Time 0.153ms


Read - Random Access & Extra tests


Write - Random Access & Extra tests


File Benchmark
Sequential 4KB randon Read - 84750 IOPS / Write - 169440 IOPS
ATTO DISK Benchmark over 128KB test, max read is 1118.4 Mb/s and max write is 1047.5 MB/s


CrystalDiskMark
Seq Read - 1012 MB/s Write - 529.9 MB/s
<All 0xFF, 0Fill> Read - 1064 MB/s Write - 993.1 MB/s
<All 0x00, 1Fill> Read - 1063 MB/s Write - 875.5 MB/s


HD Tune Pro 5.00 most items are almost double speed. CrystalDiskMark scores are also the same.
ATTO DISK Benchmark is a good software to test SSD best read/write performance with short time.
The max score is almost double as well. You can see the Raid 0 mode really improves the performance.

AS SSD Benchmark - 1423
Seq Read - 1031.05 MB/s Write - 517.00 MB/s
4K - 64Thrd Read - 456.30 MB/s Write - 407.31 MB/s


In Raid 0 mode, AS SSD Benchmark score increases about 75%.
windwithme is offline  
Old 24th January 2013, 23:41   #4
Eastern OC Expert
 
windwithme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,000
windwithme Freshly Registered
Default

PCMark Vantage - HDD Score : 77278
CrystalMark Sequential Read 1045.61 MB/s Sequential Write 940.61 MB/s


PCMark Vantage HDD Score is same as single drive. I think it?s software issue.
CrystalMark still has almost double speed.

IOMETER 2008
1 minute - 100% Read / 100% Random 4KB
Total I/Os per Second => 75398.85


3 minutes - 100% Read / 100% Random 4KB
Total I/Os per Second => 68926.28


IOMETER 2008 Random Read 4KB increases 24~35%.
1 minute to 3 minutes later, the performance drops 9%.

1 minute - 100% Write / 100% Random 4KB
Total I/Os per Second => 112569.77


3 minutes - 100% Write / 100% Random 4KB
Total I/Os per Second => 112823.49


IOMETER 2008 Random Write 4KB increases about 23%.

SSD Benchmark TOTAL => 7455.18


This software also increases 48%.

Windwithme mentioned several times when sharing SSD Raid 0 test.
That moment, Intel Rapid Storage Technology didn?t support Raid 0 Trim mode. So the speed would drop after using for long time.
Few months ago, Storage Technology Drive 11.5 released and official support Raid 0 Trim.
This is really a good news for Raid 0 mode users.
It also pushes SSD further performance and applications to wider range.



SandForce SF-2281 controller has been launched over 18 months.
From high end SATA3 SSD position to current 80% market share, the price is close to entry SATA3 SSD.
As different service terms and warranty, the price is different.
Popularity and price is SandForce strength. The weakness is random write beginning is risng from 200 more MB/s to 500 MB/s slowly.

This time, CORSAIR Force GS uses different NAND Flash ICs. Some performance is improved a little.
As Max Random 4k Write (IOMeter 08) over 90k IOPS (4k aligned) is the major improvement.
This article shares you the different performance of SandForce SF-2281 controller with different NAND Flash.
Also, Intel Rapid Storage Technology Drive high performance in Raid 0 mode.
You can use it as your reference for further SSD purchasing.

This article is also in my blog - WIND3C, Any comments are welcome.
windwithme is offline  
Old 25th January 2013, 07:32   #5
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,739
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
This article is also in my blog - WIND3C, Any comments are welcome.
nice site, a LOT of info there! you're a benchmark machine!

Quote:
That moment, Intel Rapid Storage Technology didn?t support Raid 0 Trim mode. So the speed would drop after using for long time.
Few months ago, Storage Technology Drive 11.5 released and official support Raid 0 Trim.
would love to see a test of this;

*HDTAch benchmark
full random IO write to the RAID 0 array
re-run *HDTach benchmark
re-peat full random IO write
re-run *HDTach benchmark

if TRIM is working on the RAID 0 performance should remain +/- consistent, if it's not working then performance will degrade quickly.

*HDTach
http://www.majorgeeks.com/HDTach_d672.html
__________________
jmke is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Corsair Force GT 240GB RAID SSD Review @ RWLabs Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 29th November 2012 08:24
SandForce TRIM Issue & Corsair Force Series GS (240GB) Review Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 23rd November 2012 07:13
Corsair Force GS 240GB SSD jmke WebNews 0 29th August 2012 08:18
Corsair Force GS 240GB RAID Review @ RWLabs Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 21st August 2012 07:36
Corsair Force GS 240GB SSD Review @ RWLabs Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 30th July 2012 09:25
Corsair Force GS 240GB Review @ Vortez Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 26th July 2012 07:24
Corsair Force GT 240GB SSD Review @ RWLabs Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 2nd July 2012 11:04
Corsair 240GB Force GT RAID0 Review Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 5th January 2012 06:18
Corsair Force GT 240GB Solid State Drive Review Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 3rd October 2011 13:21
Corsair Force F40 RAID0 jmke WebNews 0 23rd December 2010 16:48

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:26.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO