It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Hardware Madness > General Madness - System Building Advice
Building a NAS Building a NAS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Building a NAS
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th February 2009, 15:58   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,998
piotke Freshly Registered
Default Building a NAS

The goal:

I'm willing to build something to store data on once place. Easy accessible. Now all the data is spread over multiple disks in multiple pc's.

The needs:
- (trans)portable. Something that fits in backpack.
- 1.5 to 2 Tb is more then enough.
- accessible and readable for multiple OS (OSX; Linux and Windows)
- Silent

Extra info:
- There won't be any life crucial info stored. So there won't be a need of super duper redundancy. If it's lost, it's redownloadable.
- Multimedia functions, such as mediacenter like solutions would be nice, but also not the main goal.



Solutions:
1. A real home solution NAS. conceptronic with two 1 TB disks. Total price is about 310 euro.
++ cheap
++ plug and play
-- slow
-- limited in options

2. A small pc, with 2 disks. That would cost:
- 50 Small case
- 85 Dual core atom based mobo
- 20 2 gig DDR2
- 160 the two 1 Tb disks
Total: 315
++ Also cheap
++ Faster
++ I can add easy wifi
++ can also suit other purposes
-- bigger
-- more configuration work
This can even be cheaper, when using single core atom and/or less memory.


Another option is to make it more performant. Then I would choose:
- 50 Small case
- 135Fast G45 based board
- 70 Intel E5200 Dual Core (But this one I already have)
- 20 2 gig DDR2
- 160 the two 1 Tb disks
-- Total Price: 435
++ Very fast
++ I can add easy wifi
++ Lost of extra's possible, also use it as a PC / movie computer / ...
-- more expensive
-- a bit more power hungry (the 5200 idle is very economic)


At first I would just install a Simple Windows XP, and an FTP server.

What do you think ?
__________________
.
piotke is offline  
Old 15th February 2009, 16:23   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,700
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Conceptronic has you beat in size and portability and weight; a PC will be 2-3x bigger/heavier
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 15th February 2009, 16:28   #3
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,998
piotke Freshly Registered
Default

yes, but from what I've seen, it's utterly slow

C'mon 3 Mb per sec....
__________________
.
piotke is offline  
Old 15th February 2009, 16:45   #4
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,700
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

uPNP was indexing all the files during that test... I've edited those results in the original thread

current results are:

single session FTP 3-4mb/s, up to 10 current session speed goes up to 18-22mb/s

single session SAMBA (windows share): 12-13mb/s
multiple sessions average speed remains pretty much the same

these are READ speeds

copying TO the RAID0 array is for both FTP/SAMBA 15mb/s+
granted that it's not 30-40mb/s as I see between two workstations on Gigabit, but for the price & portability, it's really sufficiently fast
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 15th February 2009 at 16:48.
jmke is offline  
Old 15th February 2009, 17:16   #5
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,998
piotke Freshly Registered
Default

when not using any raid. Is the performance better ?
__________________
.
piotke is offline  
Old 15th February 2009, 17:25   #6
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,700
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

I've read that JBOD vs RAID 0/1 the CPU load is lower, but performance remains the same. Writing speed is higher to the NAS single session wise; very weird. I send an email to Conceptronic to ask what's up.

also FTP server has only very basic user access rights, not enough to satisfy my needs
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 15th February 2009 at 22:29.
jmke is offline  
Old 15th February 2009, 20:22   #7
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,998
piotke Freshly Registered
Default

Keep me updated
__________________
.
piotke is offline  
Old 21st February 2009, 15:58   #8
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,998
piotke Freshly Registered
Default

I didn't follow the advise here....

Got me a shuttle K45 barebone with a E2220 from intel. Together about 160 euro.
As harddisks I have 2 Samsung Spinpoints 1 TB 32 Mb cache.
Using a cross UTP cable, to anther PC (Samsung 750 gig) I get copy speeds of +/- 50 Mb / sec (with small files) and it goes up to 60 / 65 when copying big files. Eat that NAS of JMke

It's bigger, but still transportable. It's faster. And price is about the same.
__________________
.
piotke is offline  
Old 21st February 2009, 16:59   #9
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,700
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

you did follow your advice

Quote:
Building a NAS
you build one

but I don't agree on transportability

Shuttle: 280 (l) x 190(b) x 170(h) mm = 9044 cm³
NAS: 194 (l) x 102(b) x 137(h) mm = 2711 cm³

your Shuttle is 233% bigger. I can almost put the Conceptronic in pocket of my coat

Have to admit though that performance kicks ***! what OS are you running on it?

price wise you have mobo/case/cpu/ram/optical drive which will put in near/over €200 mark without HDDs, right? not too bad for €50 more. How many HDDs can you fit max?
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 21st February 2009 at 17:06.
jmke is offline  
Old 21st February 2009, 17:09   #10
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,700
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

what's the power usage of the thing btw?

here with 2xHDDs: 22W idle, 26W load


hot running potato too it seems http://www.thetechlounge.com/article...ebones-System/

where did you buy it ?
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 21st February 2009 at 17:14.
jmke is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thecus Intros N4200 NAS with 6D Technology jmke WebNews 0 1st March 2010 14:47
QNAP Unveils Intel Core 2 Duo, 8-bay, 16TB iSCSI NAS - TS-809 Pro jmke WebNews 0 16th February 2009 11:25
QNAP Announces the World's First 4-Bay Intel Atom-based NAS - TS-439 Pro Turbo NAS jmke WebNews 0 4th February 2009 15:31
QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NAS Released, Tested jmke WebNews 0 21st November 2008 11:13
Bytecc LANDISK NAS Hard Drive Enclosure Sidney WebNews 0 17th October 2005 04:27

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO