anybody need a new screen?

The Senile Doctor · 29th April 2004, 12:42

BlackRabbit · 29th April 2004, 16:46

it's not THAT expensive, early TFTs where equally priced for worse quality

29th April 2004, 16:52

working atm on one of the first TFT's around. cost 1000€, 15", DFP connector. got a special AGP card with DFP here, but I'm using a DFP=>DVI adapter to my GF4

The Senile Doctor · 29th April 2004, 21:19

it's a bargain, what does that mean?

it's dirt cheap in my humble opinion!

Gamer · 29th April 2004, 21:29

give 'm hell Doc.

BlackRabbit · 29th April 2004, 22:47

Quote:

Originally posted by calantak
it's a bargain, what does that mean?

it's dirt cheap in my humble opinion!

I thought you were being sarcastic

It's pretty cheap indeed, though I can't pay it

187(V)URD@ · 29th April 2004, 23:48

I call that a nice screen

7th May 2004, 11:28

Yea that looks awesome. Bit on the big and expensive side for me. Been looking into the 17" & 18" models. Wierdly theres a 17" model that has a response time of 16ms but the fastest 18" was only 25ms. Also the 17" & 18" models have a native resolution of 1280x1024 but does that mean thats as high as they can go?

I'm looking for a 17" or 18" LCD with resolutions of 1600x1200 with under 20ms response time? But not too sure if the 17" model with 16ms response time will do 1600x1200. If it does i might just have to get me one of those!

8th May 2004, 11:14

for 1600*1200 you'll need a larger screen, and you'll have to deal with an even lower refreshrate. (respons time will also be lower most likely)

I saw a 20.1" screen for iiyama that had a native resolution of 1600*1200.

And yes, natative resolution means that it can't go higher. Ad if you go lower your screen gets blurry (unless you divide the resolution exaclty by 2, 3 or 4)

8th May 2004, 14:29

Ahhh poo. Looks like i won't be buying a new monitor yet. As i haven't seen any 17" or 18" LCD monitors capable of 1600x1200. Will this ever be possible? I know technology is supposed to be getting better for LCD monitors

29th April 2004, 12:42	#1
The Senile Doctor Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is Posts: 3,171	anybody need a new screen? it's a bargain at 1000 euros __________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world

29th April 2004, 16:46	#2
BlackRabbit Member Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,202	it's not THAT expensive, early TFTs where equally priced for worse quality __________________ >> imagehosting.jumbee.net -> Free Image Hosting >> favorites.jumbee.net -> Bookmark Manager >> www.datanuke.be -> Lanparty Network Rental, community & reviews

29th April 2004, 21:19	#4
The Senile Doctor Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is Posts: 3,171	it's a bargain, what does that mean? it's dirt cheap in my humble opinion! __________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world

29th April 2004, 21:29	#5
Gamer [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 4,587	give 'm hell Doc. __________________

29th April 2004, 23:48	#7
187(V)URD@ Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 923	I call that a nice screen __________________ AMD Opteron 146@3ghz H2O Storm \| DFI NF4 Ultra-D \| 2512MB Gskill LE \| X800GTO²@X850XT-PE \| 2250GB Hitachi \| Modded Aopen H600B\| Seasonic 600W \| MX510@450HZ \| 19\" TFT BenQ 937s+ \|3DMARK2001 AMD XP2400+@2600+ \| Epox 8rda+ \| 2*256 Twinmos BH5 \| Club3D 9600Pro \| Maxtor 80GB + 200GB \| server + moviestation \|

29th April 2004, 16:52	#3
TeuS Posts: n/a	working atm on one of the first TFT's around. cost 1000€, 15", DFP connector. got a special AGP card with DFP here, but I'm using a DFP=>DVI adapter to my GF4

7th May 2004, 11:28	#8
0raclé Posts: n/a	Yea that looks awesome. Bit on the big and expensive side for me. Been looking into the 17" & 18" models. Wierdly theres a 17" model that has a response time of 16ms but the fastest 18" was only 25ms. Also the 17" & 18" models have a native resolution of 1280x1024 but does that mean thats as high as they can go? I'm looking for a 17" or 18" LCD with resolutions of 1600x1200 with under 20ms response time? But not too sure if the 17" model with 16ms response time will do 1600x1200. If it does i might just have to get me one of those!

8th May 2004, 11:14	#9
FreeStyler Posts: n/a	for 16001200 you'll need a larger screen, and you'll have to deal with an even lower refreshrate. (respons time will also be lower most likely) I saw a 20.1" screen for iiyama that had a native resolution of 16001200. And yes, natative resolution means that it can't go higher. Ad if you go lower your screen gets blurry (unless you divide the resolution exaclty by 2, 3 or 4)

8th May 2004, 14:29	#10
0raclé Posts: n/a	Ahhh poo. Looks like i won't be buying a new monitor yet. As i haven't seen any 17" or 18" LCD monitors capable of 1600x1200. Will this ever be possible? I know technology is supposed to be getting better for LCD monitors

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
LCD Screen "blackouts"	moejoe	Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs	7	18th April 2008 18:04
Green screen when playing video's	jelmerlan	Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs	3	31st August 2006 15:39
planning to buy this screen	kr15t0f	Mad Bargains	12	15th August 2004 18:42
Lilliput 7" Wide Screen VGA TFT LCD with Touch Screen	Sidney	WebNews	0	15th July 2004 08:17
ECS G900 executive notebook PC delivers power, big screen display	jmke	WebNews	1	15th March 2004 05:42
LCD screen + keypad + LCDC soft + some leds and knobs gives ?	Pirre	Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding	6	31st July 2002 20:02