halo : combat evolved to the minimum - Page 3

FreeStyler · 27th October 2003, 12:56

people you ought to be doing something wrong.
I got no probs, and it's not that I got da killer rig yet.

The Senile Doctor · 6th November 2003, 15:14

http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?im...NF8yX 2wuZ2lm
there is a problem, this is on an 9800 xt versus nvidia's maximum card, both are 600 euro cards on a bombrig...
look at those framerates, at 1024*768
average is never over 45, and even 30 fps on nvidia's flagship 5950 card!

even on my rig, with a 500 mhz 9800 pro with 800 mhz whopping ramspeed it's choppy...
check this, one minute of gaming... 3600 mhz p4 @ 240 1:1/500mhz core gpu-800 mhz ram, 1024*768, 4*aa, 16*af...
other games give me 100+ fps on these settings in 1024...
2003-11-06 16:18:42 - halo
28-30-31-73-75-74-75-75-75-31-9-29-31-31-29-28-30-32-34-36-36-36-47-37-35-32-31-30-33-35-38-40-40-31-40-32-41-35-28-28-26-28-26-19-26-23-23-25-25-25-24-23-21-22-24-24-21-33--29-23-23-22

this is unplayable...btw, the 75 fps moment was when I stood against the wall and didn't move

and this : same level
2003-11-06 16:32:41 - halo

217--217-218-186-5-31-67-71-71-114-113-109-108-88-78-101121-127-122-133-96-85-85-66-6982110101-88-98-90-65-64-56-76-80-71-57-71-91-93-95-87-83-91-74-75-73-71-73-72-73-92-95-136-11192-123-124-127-150-112-96-102-100-92-79-79-103-56-169-214--

lod bias veryyyy ugly, 0*aa, 0*af...even then it dips to 70 fps... and that is extremely low detail (unplayably low, cos you see textures the size of your mouse to shoot at

)

The Senile Doctor · 6th November 2003, 18:30

SOMEBODY REPLY!

jmke · 6th November 2003, 18:40

my average FPS is the same on a Ti4600

piotke · 6th November 2003, 19:41

Quote:

Originally posted by calantak
SOMEBODY REPLY!

crappy config

The Senile Doctor · 7th November 2003, 21:00

a little bit of call of duty : heavy action packed scene with the tiger tank in level 3
1280*1024 6*fsaa, 16*qual af, all detail inside the game on maximum
2003-11-07 21:56:15 - CoDSP

185-155-112-110-116-114-120-119-124-134-131-137-136-145-----146-145-143-138-141-135-128-114-108-110-112-132-127-120--118--126-128-141-116-99-104-88-96-79-76-210-196

hardly any moment below 100 fps

DUR0N · 8th November 2003, 00:15

Quote:

Originally posted by jmke
played HalfLife on a Cel466+Voodoo2

played hl on p1 133 and 2mb vidcard.

cs is a bit more demanding

jmke · 16th November 2003, 02:10

http://users.pandora.be/amd/ima/nfs-underground.wmv

NFS fun mit FRAPS 2.0

16th November 2003, 12:20

Quote:

Originally posted by jmke
http://users.pandora.be/amd/ima/nfs-underground.wmv

NFS fun mit FRAPS 2.0

dude u suck

jmke · 16th November 2003, 12:52

1024x768x32bit + recording .avi with sound at high detail = not fluent gameplay

27th October 2003, 12:56	#21
FreeStyler Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Antwerp Posts: 1,186	people you ought to be doing something wrong. I got no probs, and it's not that I got da killer rig yet. __________________ Put brain in gear BEFORE engaging mouth.

6th November 2003, 15:14	#22
The Senile Doctor [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is Posts: 3,171	http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?im...NF8yX 2wuZ2lm there is a problem, this is on an 9800 xt versus nvidia's maximum card, both are 600 euro cards on a bombrig... look at those framerates, at 1024768 average is never over 45, and even 30 fps on nvidia's flagship 5950 card! even on my rig, with a 500 mhz 9800 pro with 800 mhz whopping ramspeed it's choppy... check this, one minute of gaming... 3600 mhz p4 @ 240 1:1/500mhz core gpu-800 mhz ram, 1024768, 4aa, 16af... other games give me 100+ fps on these settings in 1024... 2003-11-06 16:18:42 - halo 28-30-31-73-75-74-75-75-75-31-9-29-31-31-29-28-30-32-34-36-36-36-47-37-35-32-31-30-33-35-38-40-40-31-40-32-41-35-28-28-26-28-26-19-26-23-23-25-25-25-24-23-21-22-24-24-21-33--29-23-23-22 this is unplayable...btw, the 75 fps moment was when I stood against the wall and didn't move and this : same level 2003-11-06 16:32:41 - halo 217--217-218-186-5-31-67-71-71-114-113-109-108-88-78-101121-127-122-133-96-85-85-66-6982110101-88-98-90-65-64-56-76-80-71-57-71-91-93-95-87-83-91-74-75-73-71-73-72-73-92-95-136-11192-123-124-127-150-112-96-102-100-92-79-79-103-56-169-214-- lod bias veryyyy ugly, 0aa, 0af...even then it dips to 70 fps... and that is extremely low detail (unplayably low, cos you see textures the size of your mouse to shoot at ) __________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world

6th November 2003, 18:30	#23
The Senile Doctor [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is Posts: 3,171	SOMEBODY REPLY! __________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world

6th November 2003, 18:40	#24
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,419	my average FPS is the same on a Ti4600 __________________

7th November 2003, 21:00	#26
The Senile Doctor [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is Posts: 3,171	a little bit of call of duty : heavy action packed scene with the tiger tank in level 3 12801024 6fsaa, 16*qual af, all detail inside the game on maximum 2003-11-07 21:56:15 - CoDSP 185-155-112-110-116-114-120-119-124-134-131-137-136-145-----146-145-143-138-141-135-128-114-108-110-112-132-127-120--118--126-128-141-116-99-104-88-96-79-76-210-196 hardly any moment below 100 fps __________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world

16th November 2003, 02:10	#28
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,419	http://users.pandora.be/amd/ima/nfs-underground.wmv NFS fun mit FRAPS 2.0 __________________

16th November 2003, 12:52	#30
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,419	1024x768x32bit + recording .avi with sound at high detail = not fluent gameplay __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Finishing the fight: Ars reviews Halo 3	jmke	WebNews	0	25th September 2007 15:57
Halo 2 (previously Vista only) coming to Windows XP	jmke	WebNews	0	5th June 2007 12:11
Halo 3 no more - meet Forerunner	jmke	WebNews	1	18th May 2006 21:45
Halo 2 on the PC? Yes, but it'll require Vista	jmke	WebNews	0	9th February 2006 23:31
Halo to be enhanced by Xbox 360	jmke	WebNews	0	25th October 2005 18:48
Jackson Wins 'Halo' Franchise	jmke	WebNews	1	17th October 2005 17:08
Halo 2 Multiplayer Map Pack	Sidney	WebNews	0	26th August 2005 02:23
Halo 2 Screens, Port Royale 2 Review, CS:Source Maps	jmke	WebNews	0	29th October 2004 19:11