It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Hardware Madness > Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding
what heatsink what heatsink
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


what heatsink
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 26th February 2004, 17:22   #21
TeuS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

no, I forgot about that.

my 2nd machine is home again, I'll start testing.... er....

how about now
 
Old 26th February 2004, 18:11   #22
TeuS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ok, here's the setup
Koolance Case, 350W Enermax PSU, dual fans at low speed

ECS K7S5A, 2000+ Tbred A, a stock 2500+ heatsink (alu-cu), a v7+ heatsink and the 2500+ 60mm fan. I'll also do some testing with a 60-80mm fan adapter and a silent 80mm sleeve bearing fan
 
Old 26th February 2004, 19:28   #23
TeuS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

alu/cu, 60mm fan, 12v: CPU 43°, case 32°, ambient 25.5°
 
Old 26th February 2004, 20:04   #24
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

and the copper one?
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 26th February 2004, 20:07   #25
TeuS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

heheheheh. I have my own way to test heatsinks

same setup, fan on 7volt: CPU 51, case 31~32
 
Old 26th February 2004, 22:18   #26
TeuS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

fan at 5v: CPU 62, case 31

if my 60-80mm fan adapter gets here by the weekend I'll wait to test with a 80mm fan, if not I'll test the V7+
 
Old 27th February 2004, 10:44   #27
TeuS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

v7+ heatsink: CPU 49, case 33
 
Old 27th February 2004, 13:39   #28
TeuS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

V7+, fan at 7v: 58°/31°
 
Old 27th February 2004, 14:09   #29
TeuS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 8-ball
When will people learn that HSF manufacturers only use aluminium because it is:

cheaper
lighter
cheaper
easier to manufacturer
cheaper

and did I mention cheaper.

I will concede that aluminium DOES radiate thermal energy better than copper. However, raidation is simply not a significant mode of heat dissipation unless you are cooling something in a vacuum. It also needs to be significantly hotter than the surroundings to get a reasonable amount of heat dissipation.

As for convection.

Convective heat transfer, the process by which thermal energy is transferred from a solid into a moving body of fluid, such as water in your water block, or air flowing through a rad, is INDEPENDENT of the material of which the rad/block is manufactured.

The only bearing the material has on the heat transfer is getting the thermal energy to the surface. Once it is at the surface, it may as well be glass for all I care. The only thing which determines how well the thermal energy is dissipated in to the air flow, is the physical properties of the liquid/gas, the flow regime, and the geometry of the transferring surface.

8-ball

Quote:
Originally posted by 8-ball
Aluminium IS a better radiator, in that its radiating properties are closer to that of a black body than copper.

However, as I said, radiation simply doesn't figure significantly enough for using aluminium to perform better than copper due to the performance hit associated with the conduction of thermal energy to the dissipating surface.

Just about the only scenario where aluminium's better radiating (and let me point out, that it isn't that much better) properties justify it's use are in space, where ALL thermal energy must be dissipated by radiation due to the vacuum.

As long as there is some medium to carry the heat away by convective heat transfer, then radiation properties are pretty irrelevent.

8-ball
Quote:
Originally posted by 8-ball
As i understand it, the myth that aluminium is a better radiator, (and a common myth) is down to the radiative properties of the materials. It is true that aluminium is a better radiator, but radiation doesn't playa big enough role for this fact to outweigh it's much poorer conductivity.

As I alos said, and you correctly backed up, cost is the predominant factor in using aluminium over copper for thermal management applications, and maybe weight.

8-ball

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...threadid=30286
 
Old 27th February 2004, 14:30   #30
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by TeuS
V7+, fan at 7v: 58°/31°
ineens 7°C warmer als voor den edit?
__________________
jmke is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thermaltake TMG IA1 CPU Heatsink jmke WebNews 0 30th November 2009 13:43
Zalman CNPS8700 LED Low Noise Heatsink Review jmke WebNews 0 7th February 2008 09:50
Akasa Evo Blue AK-922 Heatsink jmke WebNews 0 20th June 2007 00:28
Thermalright announces heatsink monster: IFX-14 CPU Cooler jmke WebNews 4 23rd March 2007 13:15
Zalman CNPS9500-AM2 Socket AM2 Low Noise Heatsink jmke WebNews 2 24th May 2006 00:11
AMD Socket-AM2 K9 Heatsink Spotted in the Wild? Sidney WebNews 2 16th February 2006 18:22
Dynatron A41 V-Shaped Skived Athlon64 Heatsink Sidney WebNews 0 1st November 2005 23:48
Scythe Shogun CPU Heatsink Sidney WebNews 5 1st July 2005 17:46
Radian Heatsink Crown Helix Cooler Sidney WebNews 0 22nd October 2004 05:31
Radian Heatsink Crown Helix Cooler Sidney Articles & Howto's 0 22nd October 2004 05:24

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:47.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO