| Thread Tools |
29th April 2005, 07:26 | #1 |
Eastern OC Expert Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,092
| It¡¦s San Diego FX57?! Equips with E4 stepping and SSE3 technology Got it last night... A strange stuff It¡¦s San Diego core with SSE3. The default Vcore is 1.4V. I just touch the AMDX2 4800+(2.4G 1MBDual Core Version) 2 days ago... It makes me interest in dual core¡K 200X14=2.8G Test 1.4V 2.8G CPUMARK break score 360 easily... In the same clock, the high or low frequency doesn¡¦t impact the CPUMARK too much, but PI is faster 0.5 second I will test it detail as I get time... |
29th April 2005, 07:42 | #2 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| Show us what you can get out from it
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
29th April 2005, 17:55 | #3 |
Eastern OC Expert Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,092
| Come on!!! Come on!!! Main course is coming!!! CPUZ 1.28-6 still cannot distinguish correctly BTW, EVEREST b0320 which update several times per day detect correctly. EVEREST shows Take a photo by DC It exposes my desktop with some many messy files... Finally, it¡¦s touched CPUZ certification http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=14897 Some abroad test 4200+ San Diego and use CPU-Z 1.27 version is also in a muck¡K http://div.bizcity.ro/article.php?sid=9396 So I just said don¡¦t post CPUZ. It doesn¡¦t mean anything. Just shows CPU-Z update is not fast enough... As this CPU is engineering samlpe, I don¡¦t post the physical CPU photo. I don¡¦t want to be invited by AMD to drink coffee |
29th April 2005, 19:12 | #4 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,587
| damn, thought they where on 0.9 micron ? you want to send it over ? |
30th April 2005, 01:35 | #5 |
Posts: n/a
| cpu-z verifictation still shows the errors though I am eagerly awaiting your overclocking results :grin: |
2nd May 2005, 04:42 | #6 |
Eastern OC Expert Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,092
| One more software party As you can see, EVEREST updates from 0316 to 0322 in 3 days That¡¦s why he can detect correct information. Socket 939 San Diego E4 SSE3 Japanese CrystalCPUID can distinguish San Diego core and NV technology as well. CPU-Z is really awful, even detect it as Socket 940. As a matter of course 0.13.SH7-B3 and SledgeHammer these kind wrong information. The test below of 4200+ CPU-Z is even worse. http://div.bizcity.ro/article.php?sid=9396 However, I still got the CPUZ certified. Is it possible that I bribe the world¡¦s software providers? Is it possible that San Diego + SSE3 + E4 is not FX57? Does AMD have another San Diego product line for FX51, FX53, or FX55? Is that true, as this CPU cannot be reached? Motherboard and BIOS providers may got this CPU for product modification long time ago. One of my best friends who works in Inventec SERVER qualification department got 940 dual core CPU long time ago. He said I was inferior to him that only got E4 stepping not Dual Core one. laugh |
2nd May 2005, 07:04 | #7 |
Eastern OC Expert Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,092
| I waste lots of time for boring CPU-Z. I¡¦ve been using computer for 6 years and not first time using CPU-Z. Usually, when new CPU coming, CPU-Z always need new updated version to solve the wrong detection issue. As I use 0.09 K8 CPU, what I learn is the performance is similar between water-cooling and air-cooling. If you need more OC room, you have to use compressors or liquid nitrogen. The test below is base on water-cooling system and I thought the OC ability is better than 0.13 FX55. There¡¦re some rumors that AMD will launch 0.09 FX55? Is it possible that my all software detect incorrectly. All test software loses the face. I don¡¦t think so. At least I trust Everest as it updates so often. OC a little bit 2866Mhz Performance 2933Mhz Last year I also test 1 CPU before launched, the date is very new 0.13 939 3800+ ES, but the OC ability is not so good. If it is the top level product as well, the OC ability is really limited. Anyway, we still can see some new point. In normal cooling condition, AMD frequency limitation lever up from 2.7 or 2.8GHz to 2.8 or 2.9GHz. This is another progress milestone. All tests are finished now. It brings too many disputes. I consider returning the CPU to suppress everything. |
2nd May 2005, 08:05 | #8 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 479
| It's good to see screens of the new king. keep bringing the OC screens if possible. But how the hell do you get always the new stuff?
__________________ |
2nd May 2005, 08:28 | #9 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
| The confusion could come from engineering samples and AMD has not released micro-codes to any software detection. Or, the noise is intentionally created by AMD in driving the enthusiasts crazy for awhile before they can produce the chips in large volume.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD K8 E4 Stepping: SSE3 Performance | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 18th February 2005 00:57 |
Thread Tools | |
| |