 |  |  |  |  |
Radeon 9500 benchmark here... 27573 3DMarks???
| |||||||||
|
Radeon 9500 benchmark here... 27573 3DMarks???
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
26th June 2002, 06:39
| #2 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
 |  total fake
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
26th June 2002, 08:07
| #3 |
| Member  Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,711
| even the photoshop is done badly |
|
|
|
26th June 2002, 10:08
| #4 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,711
|  |
|
|
|
26th June 2002, 11:40
| #5 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| euhm. with all due respect, beste, maar dat is niet juist. de se zegt altijd : was not run using default settings... altijd... en de tests die hij gedaan heeft zijn de enige die tellen voor een score...MAAR DE COUNTUP IS NIET CORRECT (postedit!!!!!!) en die 'tests not run yet" staat er ook altijd op als het project nog nie gesaved is... daar zijn er geen problemen denk ik... maar de score is waarschijnlijk gedaan met een texturedisabler, waardoor hij alle fps heeft verdubbeld.... eigenlijk is dat dom... had hij diezelfde bench gedaan met texture disabler op 1600x1024 en met fsaax4 dan had hij wrsch een score gehad van rond de 17000... maar er is één probleem natuurlijk, op een compare url gaan we zien dat zijn cpuspeed niet zo bijster zal zijn...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
26th June 2002, 11:48
| #6 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,711
| if that's all true (*) ... how do you explain the correct recognition of the card, being "radeon 9500" ? (*) looking at pic at the bottom of this thread proves the statement |
|
|
|
26th June 2002, 12:21
| #7 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| i cannot explain that and that seems to be entirely frauduleus, but the other changes are quite frequent. I always run default, and since 2001se, it's always labeled as NON-default, and I've seen the same thing with about every se result there is. however his add-up of the tests is wrong too... he could at least have done that right...
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
26th June 2002, 12:49
| #8 |
|
Posts: n/a
| Why isn't it possible to detect that card?? I guess it's a noobish question, but I'm still learning....  |
|
26th June 2002, 13:23
| #9 |
|
Posts: n/a
| Can someone describe to me how 3DMarks are totalled? Is it just a sum of the FPS in each test, multiplied by something else or...??? It would be nice to see another source of benchmarks of course. |
|
26th June 2002, 13:25
| #10 |
| Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,171
| low detail tests fpsx10 ( (car+dragothic+lobby)x10) + hi detailx20 (car+lobby+dragothic+nature)
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs 4670 Benchmark | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd December 2009 15:12 |
| Risen in graphics card benchmark test - Radeon HD 5870 on top | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 28th September 2009 12:47 |
| Geforce 8600GTS vs Radeon X1950XTX Benchmark Results [fake?] | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 4th April 2007 10:02 |
| Hercules Radeon 9500 Pro | Falco | Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding | 9 | 25th May 2003 10:56 |
| radeon 9500 en cuda V hd | vegeta | Mad Bargains | 2 | 6th April 2003 22:16 |
| Connect3D Ati Radeon 9500 | RichBa5tard | Articles & Howto's | 56 | 31st March 2003 15:36 |
| radeon 9500 pro | Zinzin | General Madness - System Building Advice | 9 | 31st December 2002 15:39 |
| You May Now OC Your RADEON 9500 PRO/9700 | Bosw8er | Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding | 3 | 21st December 2002 12:24 |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
