It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Hardware Madness > Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding
Pentium 4 benchmarking Pentium 4 benchmarking
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Pentium 4 benchmarking
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 20th November 2008, 22:45   #21
[M] Reviewer
 
geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
geoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registered
Default

Yes I got paint, that is not the issue. The system freezes when I press print screen 90% of the time. It often freezes when I open paint, open task scheduler, ... You see, even taking a photo is a hell of a job, when I try to grab and drag a window, system freezes. For one stupid superpi score it happened that I had to reboot 10 times before I could have every application nicely line-up in order to be hwbot valid. For every benchmark I have cpu-z, memset, clockgen running in the background, times are still okay since I could easily beat the competition cpc when I was testing the 1.5GHz willamette. Yes, better is possible, wprime and superpi 32m, but it takes so long that I'm not really interested to tweak it down just because of the printscreen issue.

The setup can run 2h wprime stable, it can run through memtest at high frequency's no problem, but just don't do anything complex like dragging windows

At optimal settings the OS uses not more then 30MB memory space though, don't think I'll gain much be using other OS. Or is there more then meets the eye?
__________________


Last edited by geoffrey : 20th November 2008 at 22:48.
geoffrey is offline  
Old 20th November 2008, 22:52   #22
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

much more; if Massman is to be believed, some copy wazaa trickery can lower your SUperPi times
__________________
jmke is offline  
Old 20th November 2008, 23:02   #23
[M] Reviewer
 
geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
geoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registered
Default

ah yes, an OCX member has made a small utility which simulates copy waza. I'm not using it at the moment, not needed in order to take first spots in superpi But... it wouldn't heard to have a copy of such well tweaked OS, safes me the time I would otherwise spend on shutting down everything which is not needed
__________________

geoffrey is offline  
Old 20th November 2008, 23:44   #24
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

It's not the amount of idle memory usage which is the key for having a good benchmarking os, it's the efficiency of the memory and resources usage that's important. Copy-waza basicly prepares the system for big calculations, which has quite a decent influence on the system's performance. For instance, iirc, the AXP setup would apparenlty have been 0.2s faster in 1M if we'd done a copy-waza.
__________________
Massman is offline  
Old 21st November 2008, 08:56   #25
Member
 
blind_ripper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,338
blind_ripper Freshly Registered
Default

server 2003 is best for P4 G
blind_ripper is offline  
Old 22nd November 2008, 11:00   #26
[M] Reviewer
 
geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
geoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registered
Default

Faster then Superpi OS?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Massman View Post
Looking good, G.

Could you send me the XLS file with all the data? I'd like to do some math on it myself

(btw, please fix the printscreen issue you have; people seem to be bothered that your verification on hwbot are photos)
What kind of calculations? Efficiency?
You see, this board can go quite high on FSB, but with multi 12 I aint going to get much higher in frequency's when using LN2, need to get the multi 14 working. 14x190=4060MHz, now that's something, CPU will probable stop clocking earlier though, 3,8GHz~3,9GHz at most. Its a step B, not same quality as Northwood step C. Would yield in roughly 180% oc, not that bad

EDIT: how exactly did you do the CPU microcode bios modification on your PT800 board?
__________________


Last edited by geoffrey : 22nd November 2008 at 11:04.
geoffrey is offline  
Old 22nd November 2008, 13:17   #27
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

I'm in doubt about the OS; it might even be so that win2k is faster on this old technology. For the Athlon XP, Win2k is apparently faster.

Yeah, I was going to check efficiency, but haven't come across anything interesting so far. It might be cool to find out in how far memory timings and dividers play a role, but that's only interesting for data analysis, not really for breaking records.

Is the multiplier of that cpu unlocked? Why doesn't 14x work?

I changed the CPU Microcode using bios editing programs, as far as I can remember. Firstly, I extracted the microcode out of the bios of a recent motherboard, then added the microcode to the new bios. It was a fairly simple program to use: completely GUI. I'll search for the program and link you
__________________
Massman is offline  
Old 22nd November 2008, 13:50   #28
[M] Reviewer
 
geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
geoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registered
Default

No idea why it doesn't work, 14 is full speed multiplier, 12x is speedstep multiplier. Probable same reason as with the E8600 on PT800, not completely supported.
__________________

geoffrey is offline  
Old 22nd November 2008, 14:03   #29
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

What bios are you using?
__________________
Massman is offline  
Old 22nd November 2008, 15:41   #30
[M] Reviewer
 
geoffrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,127
geoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registeredgeoffrey Fully Registered
Default

Latest, F23: P4C800-E Deluxe BIOS 1023
This BIOS support mobile CPU adapter card CT-479. Please do read the description before updating BIOS
Do not use old version Afudos.exe to flash BIOS.Must use new Afudos(2.07) or later revision to flash BIOS.
Using ASUSLiveUpdate to flash BIOS, you need to upgrade ASUSLiveupdate to v5.22.02 or later before flash BIOS.
This BIOS is for motherboards purchased in a retail ASUS package. If your motherboard is part of Compaq X07 Gaming PC or Compaq X09 Gaming PC systems, you should obtain BIOS updates from HP, as using this BIOS may have adverse effects, such as rendering your system unusable.
Support CPU multiplier item when using Dothan 533 with CT-479

F24 is beta BIOS, don't see why that BIOS would suddenly support the Pentium 4 mobile since these CPU's were launched way before BIOS F24 (y: 2005)
__________________

geoffrey is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Set To Release Low-Cost Dual-Core Processor : Pentium D805 jmke WebNews 0 23rd January 2006 17:14
Intel to unveil Pentium 4 successor at IDF jmke WebNews 0 13th August 2005 16:28
Intel Discontinues Mobile Pentium 4 Processors jmke WebNews 1 2nd June 2005 06:51
Intel Pentium D 820 May Be Incompatible with Third Party Chipsets jmke WebNews 0 26th May 2005 15:01
Dothan Over Netburst: Is The Pentium 4 A Dead End? Sidney WebNews 2 26th May 2005 01:58
Intel Unveils 64-bit Pentium 4 for the Masses jmke WebNews 0 22nd February 2005 16:13
General Micro Systems First to Offer Single Board Computer Based on Pentium M Process Sidney WebNews 0 24th June 2004 22:59
Hitachi Brings Intel Pentium M-Based Desktops jmke WebNews 0 22nd April 2004 09:44
Intel’s Partners Worried About New Pentium 4 Supplies jmke WebNews 0 15th April 2004 21:33
Intel Expands Centrino Processor Options - Intel Corp. Debuts New Pentium M, Celeron jmke WebNews 0 8th April 2004 10:17

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:13.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO