Core 2 duo

26th July 2007, 05:14

hey guys,

I would like to know why the e6750 is cheaper than the e6700 and e6600?

In AUS dollars

E6600 4 MB L2 2.40 GHz 1066 MHz FSB $295
E6700 4 MB L2 2.66 GHz 1066 MHz FSB $405
E6750 4 MB L2 2.66 GHz 1333 MHz FSB $245

Sorry if it is a dumb question

jmke · 26th July 2007, 08:40

Hey there, it's a good question, the E6750 is a newer CPU, based on 1333FSB, and that CPU intel is pushing to sell; so they have introduced nice price-cuts for these series , while the older ones like E6700/E6600 are being phased out.

26th July 2007, 12:20

So basicly with the new fsb speed it should be a winner?

Thanks mate

jmke · 26th July 2007, 12:39

the higher FSB bumps performance a tiny bit (~2%)

[quote]Overall, the 1333MHz FSB doesn't do much for dual core processors. Over the 20 benchmarks we sampled for this chart, the 1333MHz FSB gave us an average improvement of 1.9% over the 1066MHz FSB. There are two unique outliers in the chart: Oblivion with a 6.1% improvement and Photoshop CS3 with an 11.2% increase in performance. Both of these benchmarks are hand timed so the variance between runs is greater than normal, and we suspect that may be the reason for some of the larger than normal impact of the faster FSB but after multiple subsequent runs we were left with the same results[/quohttp://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3012&p=2te]

26th July 2007, 05:14	#1
the_duke Posts: n/a	Core 2 duo hey guys, I would like to know why the e6750 is cheaper than the e6700 and e6600? In AUS dollars E6600 4 MB L2 2.40 GHz 1066 MHz FSB $295 E6700 4 MB L2 2.66 GHz 1066 MHz FSB $405 E6750 4 MB L2 2.66 GHz 1333 MHz FSB $245 Sorry if it is a dumb question

26th July 2007, 08:40	#2
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	Hey there, it's a good question, the E6750 is a newer CPU, based on 1333FSB, and that CPU intel is pushing to sell; so they have introduced nice price-cuts for these series , while the older ones like E6700/E6600 are being phased out. __________________

26th July 2007, 12:39	#4
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	the higher FSB bumps performance a tiny bit (~2%) [quote]Overall, the 1333MHz FSB doesn't do much for dual core processors. Over the 20 benchmarks we sampled for this chart, the 1333MHz FSB gave us an average improvement of 1.9% over the 1066MHz FSB. There are two unique outliers in the chart: Oblivion with a 6.1% improvement and Photoshop CS3 with an 11.2% increase in performance. Both of these benchmarks are hand timed so the variance between runs is greater than normal, and we suspect that may be the reason for some of the larger than normal impact of the faster FSB but after multiple subsequent runs we were left with the same results[/quohttp://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3012&p=2te] __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ntel Core 2 Duo T9300 "Mobile Penryn"	jmke	WebNews	0	27th March 2008 15:59
Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 to be released on 21st Jan 07	jmke	WebNews	3	16th November 2006 06:54
AOpen Mini PC Compatible with Core 2 Duo Merom	jmke	WebNews	0	30th August 2006 22:52
Core 2 Duo Arrives for Notebooks	jmke	WebNews	0	28th August 2006 11:18
Mobile CPU Wars: Core 2 Duo vs. Core Duo	jmke	WebNews	2	3rd August 2006 15:44
NVIDIA Brings the Power of SLI Technology to Intel Core 2 Duo Platforms	jmke	WebNews	0	6th June 2006 14:02

26th July 2007, 12:20	#3
the_duke Posts: n/a	So basicly with the new fsb speed it should be a winner? Thanks mate