[J/K] Radeon HD599999990 To Take On NVIDIA's Fermi

@ 2010/02/22
Comment from wutske @ 2010/02/23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurgan View Post
Now there's some logic that's hard to dispute
Best logic ever and it always works
A Ford Fiesta sucks because an Audi R8 is much better.
EDGE sucks because 3G is much better.
Linux sucks because Windows is much better.
You suck because I'm much better.

Comment from Kougar @ 2010/02/23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Massman View Post
"Are you ready? ... because we're not *sadface*"


.
Comment from Massman @ 2010/02/22
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
I think also they have something up their sleeve; they are supposed to announce something today. Maybe they'll announce they skip releasing retail hardware based on Fermi hardware and go straight with FermiĀ²
"Are you ready? ... because we're not *sadface*"
Comment from Kurgan @ 2010/02/22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Massman View Post
Catalyst sucks because Nvidia's drivers are much better.
Now there's some logic that's hard to dispute
Comment from jmke @ 2010/02/22
I think also they have something up their sleeve; they are supposed to announce something today. Maybe they'll announce they skip releasing retail hardware based on Fermi hardware and go straight with FermiĀ²
Comment from Massman @ 2010/02/22
Catalyst sucks because Nvidia's drivers are much better. I'm sure that Nvidia will blow away this card with the GTX680 which will be much cheaper and launched very soon.
Comment from jmke @ 2010/02/22
it actually has a GTS 250 chip under the hood, dedicated for PhysX, and ATI will be including a special driver from now on which prevents NVIDIA from disabling PhysX GPU if a none-NVIDIA primary GPU is detected. It's one of the 10.3 Catalyst driver features which is not getting much publicity.
Comment from Massman @ 2010/02/22
It's worthless because it cannot do PhysX