Official ATI Radeon HD 4770 Review ~ 9 Reviews Combined In One Chart!
@ 2009/04/28Today AMD officially launched the ATI Radeon HD 4770 512Mb Video Card, build on 40nm manufacturing process, it comes at a very sharp price <$100 and performance that almost matches more expensive gear.
We data mined 9 different reviews, averaged the more than 500 scores and frame rates into one % chart. We spend time doing this so you won't have to
It seems the new ATI HD 4770 does away with NVIDIA's complete mid-range, only the GTS 250 is able to distance itself a bit, but this at a +$30 premium. The 8800/9800GT(X) series doesn't stand a chance performance/price wise. The 9600 GT is 20% slower; ATI's own HD 4670 is 37% slower; the ATI HD 4850 is only 7% quicker;
At the $99 price point there is no better choice than this video card, pure and simple. The next step is ATI HD 4870; all the other options between $100-$150 are not worth the extra cost.
The data comes from these reviews:
- http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_4770
- http://hothardware.com/articles/ATI-...4770-40nm-GPU/
- http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...r5-review.html
- http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...95&Item id=72
- http://www.techspot.com/review/163-radeon-hd-4770/
- http://www.amdzone.com/index.php/rev...ti-radeon-4770
- http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/273...ard/index.html
- http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=2392
-
We data mined 9 different reviews, averaged the more than 500 scores and frame rates into one % chart. We spend time doing this so you won't have to
It seems the new ATI HD 4770 does away with NVIDIA's complete mid-range, only the GTS 250 is able to distance itself a bit, but this at a +$30 premium. The 8800/9800GT(X) series doesn't stand a chance performance/price wise. The 9600 GT is 20% slower; ATI's own HD 4670 is 37% slower; the ATI HD 4850 is only 7% quicker;
At the $99 price point there is no better choice than this video card, pure and simple. The next step is ATI HD 4870; all the other options between $100-$150 are not worth the extra cost.
The data comes from these reviews:
- http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/HD_4770
- http://hothardware.com/articles/ATI-...4770-40nm-GPU/
- http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...r5-review.html
- http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...95&Item id=72
- http://www.techspot.com/review/163-radeon-hd-4770/
- http://www.amdzone.com/index.php/rev...ti-radeon-4770
- http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/273...ard/index.html
- http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=2392
-
- http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3553
- http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==
- http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...on-hd4770.html
- http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...4770,2281.html
- http://www.silentpcreview.com/ati-hd4770
- http://www.technic3d.com/article-862...att-klasse.htm (DE)
- http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=700
- http://techreport.com/articles.x/16820