First real performance results from Nehalem @ OCXtreme

I don't "expect" interesting comparisons to all my questions. Just is my point of view testing within the platform to see what tweaks/setups is more interesting/useful. Such as low latency RAM, or if its better to just buy the cheapest kit.

My post earlier about the SuperPI results: This bascially seems to confirm what Intel was telling people... tight timings/bandwidth doesn't seem to matter anymore. I'll wait for Anandtech to do a full review though to be sure on that.

It is funny CoreTemp is reporting temps for 8 cores.

These are only results of preliminary testing, don't expect people to push and produce interesting comparo's minutes after they recieved the hardware. He'll be updating the thread with more results, I'm sure.

By the way, if you want comparo's, search HWbot's database for scores with similarly clocked configurations (www.hwbot.org).

these OC tests have usually not a whole lot of useful info when you actually want to know how fast a the new platform is as the one doing the tests is never a regular Joe

He only does 32M for the stock settings. Nothing to compare against within his testing. More interested in latency/timing effects on performance

1M has nothing to do with memory speed; compare 32M for real differences

Okay, that's funny.

3.2GHz DDR3-1600 7-7-7-21 SuperPI 1M 12.703 seconds
27.4ns Latency

3.2GHz DDR3-1333 9-9-9-24 SuperPI 1M 12.750 seconds
36.8ns Latency