- Back to homepage

Intel Celeron 420/430/440: New Low-End Vs. Old Middle-End

@ 2007/11/20

We have not yet touched on the new Celeron based on Conroe-L core in any of our articles, although the subject has already become ripe for discussion. In this article the above-said shortcoming is going to be corrected. We shall acquaint you with performance characteristics of the new low-end Celeron models.

Comment from jmke @ 2007/11/21

there's no doubt the E4300 is better

but it's more expensive than E2140

Comment from Kougar @ 2007/11/21

X2 3800 would seem to be, except the graphs were normalized so that "100" would be the performance of a Core 2 Duo E4300. Looks like a E4300 is the better of a X2 3800...

Very nice results, and very nice that they offered the original data file for DL.

Comment from jmke @ 2007/11/20

S939 doing pretty darn good, but that E2140 can be overclocked to surpass all others in the benchmark, without much effort

All information and graphics contained in Madshrimps are sole property of the Madshrimps crew and may not be reproduced or copied in any manner without written permission from us.