Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on FacebookHas AMD Castrated Overclocking?
@ 2003/11/26Also read this article.
Comment
from jmke
@ 2003/11/26
Doc check 1st post in this thread 
Comment
from
@ 2003/11/26
check www.overclockers.com for editorial on this article...
Comment
from
@ 2003/11/26
a very nice read, the fact is that the new FX/64 CPu's don't overclock much.
but same can be set of the first batch of Athlon XP's
my first Athlon XP1700+ did 1530Mhz.. max.. that is only a lousy ~60Mhz overclock.
My next one did 1800Mhz... and the latest one reached 2200Mhz!!
all this over a period of 1.5years.
let the FX/64 CPU grow a bit, and you'll see the overclocking capacity grow also.
exact same thing happened at the Intel side, where the first P4's (socket 423) were almost not overclock-able, the latest ones ("C" series) come close to a 50% overclock without extreme cooling.
but same can be set of the first batch of Athlon XP's
my first Athlon XP1700+ did 1530Mhz.. max.. that is only a lousy ~60Mhz overclock.
My next one did 1800Mhz... and the latest one reached 2200Mhz!!
all this over a period of 1.5years.
let the FX/64 CPU grow a bit, and you'll see the overclocking capacity grow also.
exact same thing happened at the Intel side, where the first P4's (socket 423) were almost not overclock-able, the latest ones ("C" series) come close to a 50% overclock without extreme cooling.
Copyright © 2001-2011 Madshrimps, All rights reserved.
Graphic Design by Dennis Kestelle, Programming by Maarten Menten,
Overall Site design by John Meys
All information and graphics contained in Madshrimps are sole property of the Madshrimps crew and may not be reproduced or copied in any manner without written permission from us.
