Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on FacebooknVidia Geforce FX 5700 Ultra
@ 2003/10/27nvidia's back? this $200 card reaches almost the performance of ATi's $500 one!
Comment
from Falco
@ 2003/12/16
Is the 5700 Ultra a good overclocker?
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/28
yes but for you fluently is 10fps 
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/28
c'mon, i tought the same a year ago, and now i'm gaming on a mx480, fluently, high detail, on 1024*768
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Vulk I hope that we will be able to buy this card arround christmas for about €180. My ti4200 is getting a wee bit to slow. |
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/28
I hope that we will be able to buy this card arround christmas for about €180. My ti4200 is getting a wee bit to slow.
To bad that there aren't 3dmark2k1 bechmarks.
To bad that there aren't 3dmark2k1 bechmarks.
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/28
in a way nvidia is back, since everything else they have released in the months since the GF4 series , is lacking in the price/speed departement. This 5700U actually brings it back up to speed, and it delivers a pretty good bang 4 the buck !
the small info is only a teaser, a glimpse of the full article, not particulary a summary of the whole article, not in my newsposts at least
I chose this screenshot because it was one of the most controversial ones, in the article there's an even better one, where even the Ti4200 outperforms the 9800XT
the small info is only a teaser, a glimpse of the full article, not particulary a summary of the whole article, not in my newsposts at least
I chose this screenshot because it was one of the most controversial ones, in the article there's an even better one, where even the Ti4200 outperforms the 9800XT
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/28
shouldn't your little side-info give 'first-sight' what to expect?
i've read it last week, but for people with less time, it should be more of a summary of the article no?
a superficial individual may think 'wow, nvidia is all back' and yet another misunderstanding is launched into the world..
i've read it last week, but for people with less time, it should be more of a summary of the article no?
a superficial individual may think 'wow, nvidia is all back' and yet another misunderstanding is launched into the world..
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/27
I stand corrected, thought the price would be lower of the 5700U
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/27
Beaten, no. A very worthy competetor, yes.
The price difference between a R9600 Pro and a FX5600U is pretty big (tones.be: 170 vs 220). I think it will take a while before you'll see a FX5700U < 200, while you can get a equally fast R9600Pro right now for far less.
The price difference between a R9600 Pro and a FX5600U is pretty big (tones.be: 170 vs 220). I think it will take a while before you'll see a FX5700U < 200, while you can get a equally fast R9600Pro right now for far less.
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/27
I would rather call it a "provoking" one
urging the reader to check out the article :-)
the 5700U is still the better buy in the end, the R9600 Pro has been beaten
Quote:
|
Originally posted by anes bad choice screenshot |
urging the reader to check out the article :-)
the 5700U is still the better buy in the end, the R9600 Pro has been beaten
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/27
I was terrified lol .. the new budgetcard from nvidia performing better then my new 9800pro .. thk god it's only in this benchmark Still a nice bang for the buck
Still a nice bang for the buck
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/27
bad choice screenshot
in most of the benches the 9600 is up ahead
even the ti4200 is better then a rad9600xt if you follow your subjective screen..
in most of the benches the 9600 is up ahead
even the ti4200 is better then a rad9600xt if you follow your subjective screen..
Copyright © 2001-2011 Madshrimps, All rights reserved.
Graphic Design by Dennis Kestelle, Programming by Maarten Menten,
Overall Site design by John Meys
All information and graphics contained in Madshrimps are sole property of the Madshrimps crew and may not be reproduced or copied in any manner without written permission from us.
