Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on FacebookAMD Athlon FX 51 2.2 @ 3.3Ghz!
@ 2003/10/12not that bad 
where's a p4 c to compare it with
where's a p4 c to compare it with
Comment
from calantak
@ 2003/10/12
'to compete' = to be in competitive range
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/12
no that 5ghz ***** is slower
by 1 second
28seconds by TAM
en 27 seconds by him (another crazy jap)
by 1 second
28seconds by TAM
en 27 seconds by him (another crazy jap)
Comment
from
@ 2003/10/12
i would pretty much like to game on that thing with a 24/7 ln2 injection!
and preferably with a prommy chilled 9800 pro @ 550/850
that'd be a 700fps quaker (as a standard fx-51 + a 9800 pro standard gets 500+)
maybe halo would run @ 1280 with 2*aa then
you'd need a 5 ghz p4 to compete with that ******!
and preferably with a prommy chilled 9800 pro @ 550/850
that'd be a 700fps quaker (as a standard fx-51 + a 9800 pro standard gets 500+)
maybe halo would run @ 1280 with 2*aa then
you'd need a 5 ghz p4 to compete with that ******!
Copyright © 2001-2011 Madshrimps, All rights reserved.
Graphic Design by Dennis Kestelle, Programming by Maarten Menten,
Overall Site design by John Meys
All information and graphics contained in Madshrimps are sole property of the Madshrimps crew and may not be reproduced or copied in any manner without written permission from us.
