Geforce FX 5900 Ultra Pics

@ 2003/05/09
Extra pics
Comment from jmke @ 2003/05/09
here are the numbers for 3DMark2k03

Quote:
3DMark03 1024x768
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra (Detonator 50.xx) 6678
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra (Detonator 43.51) 5981
GeForce FX 5800 Ultra (Detonator 43.51) 5429
ATi Radeon 9800 Pro 5496
Comment from FreeStyler @ 2003/05/09
Quote:
Originally posted by jmke
Calantak is not that stupid to go and Xchange a pelt cooled Radeon 9700 Pro for a new videocard, while he can already play all of his games at 1280x1024x32bit max detail, or is he?
You had to ask.

BTW, the article has been pulled, any chance on the numbers they stated.
Still, I don't believe it untill it's [H]ard.
Comment from jmke @ 2003/05/09
Calantak is not that stupid to go and Xchange a pelt cooled Radeon 9700 Pro for a new videocard, while he can already play all of his games at 1280x1024x32bit max detail, or is he?
Comment from RichBa5tard @ 2003/05/09
Quote:
Originally posted by kipni
some "knutselwerk" to do
pelt cooling needs much pressure to perform optimal... calantak is going to need one high quality holddown....
Comment from kipni @ 2003/05/09
some "knutselwerk" to do
Comment from RichBa5tard @ 2003/05/09
Quote:
Originally posted by calantak
i hope my pelt+swifty will fit
it won't

GF FX != Radeon mounting holes
Comment from kipni @ 2003/05/09
it will
Comment from calantak @ 2003/05/09
i hope my pelt+swifty will fit
Comment from kipni @ 2003/05/09
or the cooling is very bad
Comment from RichBa5tard @ 2003/05/09
huge heatsink and tiny fan? If this is true, the chip must be producing a lot less heat.
Comment from kipni @ 2003/05/09
hm i think the cooler is like a plane flying through your room
Comment from jmke @ 2003/05/09
if it is the fastest GPU on the planet I don't care what it will look like
Comment from ModdiN MansoN @ 2003/05/09
looks like a lawnmower
Comment from jmke @ 2003/05/09
thumb
Comment from jmke @ 2003/05/09
extra pics

 

reply