nVidia Officially Launches 7900 Series - Benchmarks Inside!

@ 2006/03/09
Spring already? NVIDIA has its “spring refresh,” and they cleaned a few things up, repackaged what they already have, and have given us that new silicon kind of feeling. We love the smell of silicon in the morning.

It has now been eight months since NVIDIA announced and hard launched their next generation GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) technology codenamed G70, better known as the GeForce 7800 series. The GeForce 7800 GTX and GT have been very successful GPUs for NVIDIA. Many gamers around the world have purchased video cards based on these GPUs to simply have better gaming experiences. While these GPUs were successful, around four months ago NVIDIA decided to up the ante even more by introducing a mini-refresh of their high-end GPU, the 7800 GTX offering even more performance with more local framebuffer memory and higher clock speeds. While this card was “hard launched” its inventory quickly dropped into obscurity bringing with it stories that it was only launched by NVIDIA to help win the benchmarks that it puts so much value in. NVIDIA insists that sales simply outstripped supply. Either way, there have not been many of these cards around, and after so long, it has really left us feeling that it was not much more than a type of red herring.


18 reviews/previews listed:

HardOCP: http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/articl...50aHVzaWFzdA==
Anandtech: http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2717
Bjorn3D: http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=891
TechReport: http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q1...0/index.x?pg=1
Hexus: http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=4872
HardwareZone: http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles...?cid=3&id=1839
HotHardware: http://www.hothardware.com/viewartic...leid=791&cid=2
ClubIC (FR): http://www.clubic.com/article-32655-...njour-g71.html
iXBT (RU): http://www.ixbt.com/video2/g71-part1.shtml
Beyond3D: http://www.beyond3d.com/previews/nvidia/g73/
Guru3D: http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/326/
PCPer: http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=213&type=expert
Tweaktown: http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/880/
AMDZone: http://www.amdzone.com/modules.php?o...icles&secid=13
PCstats: http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1930
ExtremeTech: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...129TX1K0000532
Overclockers.co.nz: http://www.overclockers.co.nz/ocnz/r...txa1900xtx0106
HardInfo.dk: http://www.hardinfo.dk/show.asp?desc=4372
HardwareZoom: http://www.hardwarezoom.com/viewcont...octype=Reviews
NordicHardware:
Comment from The Senile Doctor @ 2006/03/15
but in the end, they do!
Comment from jmke @ 2006/03/15
they better "tear away" as they tear away any budget too
Comment from The Senile Doctor @ 2006/03/15
well, I have to say that FOR ME the 7900 gtx sli makes a whole lot of difference compared to the 7800 gtx sli...
This evening I was home early dur to my father taking over part of my round, and I quickly plugged in the 7900's instead of the 7800's. and ran some Hardware OC benchies quickly just to see that on my screen's native resolution @ 1920*1200 all games now are playable at 4*aa and 16*af, this was totally different with the 7800's...
quake 4 UQ 1920*1200@ 4*aa, 16*af went from 27.9 to 48...
serious sam2 1920*1200 4*aa, 16*af
went from 35 average to 67 average!
cod went playable at 1920*1200 maxed out 4*aa, 16*af ( no more drops below 35...)
all these games were NOT playable at these settings be4...
so this means wih current gen games, playability with nice iq settings on big widescreen monitors DOES require 7900 gtx sli to work...

at 1280*1024 difference was MINOR between these different setups, only at 1920*1200 with eyecandy did the 7900 gtx's tear away...
Comment from jmke @ 2006/03/10
Quote:
Originally posted by koensa
06 and 05 (3d mark) clearly shows otherwise.
do you play 3DMark?
anyway, even 3DMark06 does not show a large difference -- and fear even less.

http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID= 413
Comment from Rutar @ 2006/03/10
most intresting about the 7900 series is the much lower power consumption and the killer price of the 7900GT
Comment from jmke @ 2006/03/10
what are you talking about; A64 3000+ is enough to play all latest games 1280x1024 with max detail and even 2x/4x AA with 7900GT.

just so you know; there are only a few Dual Core enabled games; and at higher resolutions they don't offer a very impressive difference between DC optimalisations enabled/disabled
Comment from jmke @ 2006/03/10
I don't think the 7800 series will drop in price; they will just disappear and be replaced with 7900 counterpart -- ebay/forums is the place to shop for 7800 I think
Comment from Adidas @ 2006/03/10
I'm quite happy with those benchmarks.

The GT7900 on its own is still slower than a pair of 7800gt, heck, even the 7900GTX is slower than them.

That's good news for people like me who bought an sli-mobo (asus p5nd2 in my case) but didn't buy the second GPU yet, hoping to be able to upgrade on the cheap in the future.
Comment from jmke @ 2006/03/09
We run this site as a hobby; not as a job like the top tier websites who get their samples in early and test the cards during the day.
Comment from wittekakker @ 2006/03/09
Why doesn't [M] get a pair of G71's?
Comment from jmke @ 2006/03/09
Now, I am aware that in reporting these test results, I am committing a grievous wrong. Have a look, for instance, at where this ranks on at the Internet Scale of Mortal Evil. Starting at the top and moving down:

* Hitler
* Clubbing innocent baby seals
* Testing video cards with mismatched drivers
* DRM



from Tech-Report

they also included the newly released X1800GTO in their tests