USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gbps Tested On Gigabyte P55A-UD6

Motherboards/Intel S1156 by Terw_Dan @ 2010-02-07

A couple of motherboard manufacturers are now including SATA 6Gbps and USB 3.0 chips on their motherboards. In this to the point article, we take look at the performance for SATA 6Gbps and USB 3.0 compared with their predecessors.

  • prev
  • Go to mainpage

Conclusive Thoughts

Conclusive Thoughts

Madshrimps (c)


  • In conclusion we can say for this Barracuda XT there is not really a necessity to include a third generation SAT controller, since there is hardly any difference noticeable.
    SATA 6Gbps however shall become more interesting in the future. With solid state drives that can reach far higher transfer rates it is likely they’ll surpass 300MB/s, the maximum of the current second generation SATA interface.

    So for people looking for a future proof system based on new SSDs SATA 6Gbps might become very interesting. But for those who want to stay with mechanical hard drives there is not really a reason to get a SATA 6Gbps controller for now, since the speeds of the current hard drives are by far not close to the maximum of the SATA 3Gbps controllers on current systems.

    Madshrimps (c)


  • In conclusion for the USB 3.0 tests, we can say USB 3.0 is a great improvement compared to USB 2.0 when high transfer speeds are necessary. For using other USB devices like mice, keyboards, printers and other devices that don't rely on fast transfer of data, USB 2.0 will still be more than sufficient.


Editor’s Note: It will be interesting to see what will become of the eSATA standard. Will it also get an upgrade? Currently eSATA is pretty much on par with the original SATA interface regarding speed and latency. It pushed Firewire to the brink of extinction on modern day motherboards and prebuild systems. Will USB 3.0 do the same for eSATA?

With both AMD and Intel not yet getting onboard the USB 3.0 and SATA 6Gbps bandwagon, it can be a while before these new standards become mainstream. This will translate in higher prices for us enthusiasts who like to have the latest gear, today.
  • prev
  • Go to mainpage
Comment from FireTech @ 2010/02/08
Did I miss something?
The SATA 6Gb interface was tested with a normal rotational HDD and concluded it was pointless for those drives - sorry but I think we could have guessed that outcome.
Why not test with fast SSD drives instead and then see if they can tax the interface?
Comment from jmke @ 2010/02/08
how many SATA 6Gbps SSDs are there?
Comment from FireTech @ 2010/02/08
Sorry, it's like trying to break the 300Mph barrier using a BMW M3 when there's a Bugatti Veyron available.
Neither will break the the barrier but one will be a whole lot closer to it
Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/02/08
I think it's clear like you mentioned that even a S-ATA 3 normal HD will be a waste of cash ( till now) bettr to go for newer SSD to unlock the potential of S-ATA 3... the tests show indeed that the limit has been reached for rotational drives... maybe we will see some interesting products at CEBIT
Comment from TERW_DAN @ 2010/02/08
Offcourse this outcome was to be expected. But since there are no 6Gbps SATA SSDs available at this moment, we wanted to taak a look how usefull this technology is when you want to buy a new motherboard today. With the Barracuda XT 2TB currently being the only 6Gbps drive available commercially this was the only drive to test it with.
When 6Gbps SATA SSDs will become available, I would like to give those a test to see if 6Gbps is usefull for those drives.
Comment from jmke @ 2010/02/08
Quote:
But since there are no 6Gbps SATA SSDs available at this moment
there is ONE
http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.ph...54&Item id=60

I don't know why Seagate released a HDD with Sata 6GBps interface, that makes no sense
Comment from Kougar @ 2010/02/08
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
how many SATA 6Gbps SSDs are there?
One. Micron RealSSD C300 Launching Feb 22nd...

Quite a few SSD's would have broken SATA 3Gbps limitation on Reads though, so I have to agree on Firetech on this one. Unless SATA 6Gbps doesn't allow offloading of the interface overhead, in which case it wouldn't matter. But that's also something to test for...
Comment from TERW_DAN @ 2010/02/08
Hopefully I'll have the chance of testing those, to see if SATA 6Gbps is usefull for an SATA 3Gbps SSD and in what rate the 6Gbps SATA is usefull for a SATA 6Gbps SSD.
Comment from jmke @ 2010/02/08
an SSD with SATA 3G will perform max up to spec of SATA 3G, even when plugged into SATA 6G connector; would be illogical if it did perform better

 

reply