Gigabyte Geforce GTX 260 Super OverClock Video Card Review

Videocards/VGA Reviews by leeghoofd @ 2010-01-12

We have seen many factory-overclocked cards from different vendors, but most of these cards just push the GPU/MEM clocks using reference design hardware. Once in a while, a cards pop up like this Gigabyte SOC card which deviates from the group and packs a whole lot more punch then what other vendors can offer.

  • prev
  • Go to mainpage

Conclusive Thoughts

Conclusive Thoughts

Even though ATI has launched its next generation 58XX series card, this Gigabyte GTX 260 SOC is really a card that you must have a look at when you are in for a new graphics card. Budget wise it won't leave a hole in your wallet. (~€170). Yet it can pack some serious punch and is able to trash some higher rated Nvidia cards. The latter sometimes retailing at a double price. Of course you can also unleash more potential on eg the GTX 275 by overclocking it. But this little Giga card has got some monster rams on board, clocked at 250mhz over the reference clocks. The handpicked GPU doing very well under air and assuring some nice OC potential. The SOC is perfectly balanced between maximum stable clocks and heato utput. We will be benching the card at [M] day on water or maybe even on LN2 (being voltmodded then) and might add a little LN2 action later on. But that's for the near future.

Madshrimps (c)



So to sum it up

I'm really impressed with this Gigabyte offering. Anyone that's going to shop for a new card, while being on a budget, can't overlook the potential this card has, especially now with the shortage of HD 5850 cards (whose price shot upwards), while this GTX 260 card remains widely available at significantly less cost. Competitively priced, performance on par and even beyond its bigger Nvidia brothers. Don't be fooled by the GTX 260 name, this card is THE works and will be able to power many gamer rigs for some time to come without breaking a sweat.

It's like buying a 16V 3 liter supercar and tagging it with Turbo diesel. This is not just another overclocked GTX 260 card, this is THE fastest out of the box GTX 260 you can get

As always I end with a Folding@home session to check stability when using the GPU for other things beside gaming:


(click to zoom)


Let's hope Gigabyte continues this GPU Gauntlet in 2010 and can create some more lovely powerhouses for the community.

Tested And Approved
Madshrimps (c)
Just a small word on the achieved recommendation. We had a lengthy discussion between the staff members if this card could qualify for a performance or value logo. Main reason why you're not seeing one is the existence of the ATI Radeon 4890 card. Which is cheaper and generally a better performer than a GTX 280 GPU. With the Tested and Approved Award we do like to point out that we really like the card's performance and reliability during our lengthy test sessions, and that this Gigabyte Super Overclock GTX 260 is Nvidia's best value card at the moment.
Pros
+ Fastest Geforce GTX 260 216 out there
+ GTX 275/280 performance at an inferior price
+ Very good bang for the buck
+ Super fast rams onboard, overclock friendly

Contras
- Maybe an aftermarket cooler could make the SOC series even better...
- AMD Radeon HD 4890 gives this card a run for its money at lower price point

I would like to thank Bernice and Sibren from Gigabyte for having me at the TweaKing event and giving us, the reviewers, an opportunity to hang around with the big boys.
  • prev
  • Go to mainpage
Comment from Gamer @ 2010/01/12
And another review from empty head

Nice one !!!
Comment from KMM @ 2010/01/13
Nice review, those are good numbers. I'm glad you actually mentioned that a 4890 is better bang for your buck. Most review sites will never do that. Its the main reason I picked up a 4870 over a 260 GTX, $80 less (at the time) for the same or better performance.

BTW, Madshrimps is the first site I visit every morning for the past 3 years. Keep up the good work.
Comment from jmke @ 2010/01/13
Hey KMM, welcome to the forums , thank you for your feedback.

Some people prefer NVIDIA hardware , either for driver support in other OS (linux) or CUDA, in such cases this GTX 260 offers a good deal.
if however you run Windows and don't care about CUDA or what brand/make your VGA card is, then 4890 will offer you better performance for the buck. Now all we needs is HD 4890 SOC edition, but I think our prayers are answered with HD 5830 set to be released soon, DX11 features, cheaper than 4890, same/higher performance
Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/01/13
me want one Got the MSI board here with integrated GPU from MM to test, might be nice to see how the crossfire actually works out...
Comment from KMM @ 2010/01/15
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
Hey KMM, welcome to the forums , thank you for your feedback.

Some people prefer NVIDIA hardware , either for driver support in other OS (linux) or CUDA, in such cases this GTX 260 offers a good deal.
if however you run Windows and don't care about CUDA or what brand/make your VGA card is, then 4890 will offer you better performance for the buck. Now all we needs is HD 4890 SOC edition, but I think our prayers are answered with HD 5830 set to be released soon, DX11 features, cheaper than 4890, same/higher performance
I agree. Ya that 5830 sounds exciting, can't wait to find out more about it.
Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/01/15
early suggested launch price is a bit over the top for me, 239 dollars... it has to be darn good then !!
Comment from jmke @ 2010/01/15
239 U.S. dollars = 165.661607 Euros
:-)
Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/01/15
if only it would be that simple to calculate the real euro price
Comment from jmke @ 2010/01/15
since HD 5850 is priced at €220-230 it would be quite impossible for HD 5830 to be more expensive or priced the same
Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/01/15
More aiming at around 190 euro's at launch, dropping to 160 euro region a few months later... but there were rumours at frst of a launch price sub 30 dollars then the current 4890 retail price... NOT
Comment from jmke @ 2010/01/15
English please I'm sure KMM doesn't understand a word of what you wrote there

OT: I'm also guess €190 EURO, more expensive than HD 4890 (which is €170 in shops) but more features too;

 

reply