Gigabyte Geforce GTX 260 Super OverClock Video Card Review

Videocards/VGA Reviews by leeghoofd @ 2010-01-12

We have seen many factory-overclocked cards from different vendors, but most of these cards just push the GPU/MEM clocks using reference design hardware. Once in a while, a cards pop up like this Gigabyte SOC card which deviates from the group and packs a whole lot more punch then what other vendors can offer.

  • prev
  • next

Test Setup & Test Results

Test Setup and Benchmark Results

Time to put the card to the test. I swapped my good old E8600 for the i950 as a daily rig. For the tests I used to the same ones as in the the Asus GTX 285 Matrix and MSI GTX 275 Lightning review. The Futuremark synthetic tests opted for are : 3DMark01, 3DMark03 and 3DMark06. For the Game tests I opted to go for games that have an integrated benchmark. This makes my life far easier and I must say that the included benchmark tools work pretty fabulous. I had some issues with Left4Dead, results not really being constant enough. Making it one of the reasons it was swapped for the new Resident Evil 5 fixed benchmark. As we are amongst Nvidia based cards I opted to use the MSI GTX 275 Lightning and the GTX 280 as comparison. Gigabyte claims this card can come close to a GTX 275 out of the box. Can it maybe handle MSI's pre OC'ed card too ?

Here's a rundown on the test rig :

Leeghoofd's i7 i950 Test Setup
CPUIntel i950 @ 3.8 (200 x 19) 1.15vcore
Cooling Thermalright eXtreme
MainboardAsus Gene II 0904 bios
Memory6Gb Corsair PC12800 Dominators at 1600mh 8-8-8-24
PSU OCZ ModStream 700W
Articles linked
to this article
  • Corsair Hydro Series H50 CPU Water-Cooling Kit Review
  • Intel Pentium E6300 Best bang for the buck ? Cache test revisited.
  • MSI GTX 275 Lightning Reviewed


  • Windows XP with SP3 was used as OS (will swap to Windows 7 soon). Latest WHQL Forceware drivers from Nvidia's website were used : namely the 191.07 one. Keep in mind that the main objective is to compare the potential of this Gigabyte card here. Again this is by al means not intended to be a common graphic cards roundup (you've read too many already).

    Game tests run at 1280 x 1024 and 1920 x 1200 resolution with the integrated benchmark tool, High detail settings selected
    Farcry 2
    Tom Clancy's HawX
    Resident Evil 5 Fixed Benchmark

    We took the average FPS from three game runs (all after a fresh reboot). Maximum FPS means nothing if your minimum FPS drops too much, making a game unplayable. Since I'm used to playing First person shooters my own personal minimum limit is 60 FPS. If I can't keep that steady I'm lowering detail levels or if I can sell my wife I'll buy new hardware.

    I ran the Gigabyte card out of the box and with the following overclock (fan speed still on AUTO) :

    Madshrimps (c)


    Like always, this card can do even more even if we up the fan speed to the max. Take note that not all cards clock the same and your final overclock can vary. For a stock cooler these are really high clocks to manage. I can vouch that the cards temps really stayed within the sub 75°C all the time during testing and stress tests. Even when I fired up ATI tool and chose to stress for artefacts the cooler on AUTO managed the heat amazingly well.

    Madshrimps (c)


    Synthetic wise, this card is a bomb. On the 3DMarks, it just crushes a reference GTX 260 SP216 card. Its higher clocks and uber ram clocks even can manage to stay ahead of a reference GTX 275 card. There's some serious potential under the hood here. When being overclocked to 725GPU speeds and the rams at 1350mhz it even eats the MSI Lightning card and its bigger brother the GTX 280 for breakfast. Note that this overclock is bulletproof on my card, during all of the synthetic and game testing. Higher clocks could be achieved with eg 3DMark01 but eg would lockup in 03. Now how does this reflect in our game tests ?

    Madshrimps (c)


    Comparing this card to a reference GTX 260 seems not fair at all. Averaging at least 10 more FPS is really amazing. The GTX 275 also has to give in and is no match for this factory overclocked monster. The extra added overclock doesn't yield much extra performance, meaning Gigabyte's engineers have chosen the clocks wisely. A good speed/stability ratio is a must for a gaming card. Benchers will be bale to hunt down them extra points with this offering for sure.

    Madshrimps (c)


    When upping the gaming resolution to 1920 x 1200, the performance of this card remains stunning. The Super Overclock Card still giving the far more expensive and higher rated Nvidia cards a slap on the bottom. This really is a GTX 260 on steroids. Nothing to be ashamed off if your neighbour at the LAN asks what Videocard you are running. If he laughs, just give him a run for his money :p I know you can do it with this card :)
    • prev
    • next
    Comment from Gamer @ 2010/01/12
    And another review from empty head

    Nice one !!!
    Comment from KMM @ 2010/01/13
    Nice review, those are good numbers. I'm glad you actually mentioned that a 4890 is better bang for your buck. Most review sites will never do that. Its the main reason I picked up a 4870 over a 260 GTX, $80 less (at the time) for the same or better performance.

    BTW, Madshrimps is the first site I visit every morning for the past 3 years. Keep up the good work.
    Comment from jmke @ 2010/01/13
    Hey KMM, welcome to the forums , thank you for your feedback.

    Some people prefer NVIDIA hardware , either for driver support in other OS (linux) or CUDA, in such cases this GTX 260 offers a good deal.
    if however you run Windows and don't care about CUDA or what brand/make your VGA card is, then 4890 will offer you better performance for the buck. Now all we needs is HD 4890 SOC edition, but I think our prayers are answered with HD 5830 set to be released soon, DX11 features, cheaper than 4890, same/higher performance
    Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/01/13
    me want one Got the MSI board here with integrated GPU from MM to test, might be nice to see how the crossfire actually works out...
    Comment from KMM @ 2010/01/15
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by jmke View Post
    Hey KMM, welcome to the forums , thank you for your feedback.

    Some people prefer NVIDIA hardware , either for driver support in other OS (linux) or CUDA, in such cases this GTX 260 offers a good deal.
    if however you run Windows and don't care about CUDA or what brand/make your VGA card is, then 4890 will offer you better performance for the buck. Now all we needs is HD 4890 SOC edition, but I think our prayers are answered with HD 5830 set to be released soon, DX11 features, cheaper than 4890, same/higher performance
    I agree. Ya that 5830 sounds exciting, can't wait to find out more about it.
    Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/01/15
    early suggested launch price is a bit over the top for me, 239 dollars... it has to be darn good then !!
    Comment from jmke @ 2010/01/15
    239 U.S. dollars = 165.661607 Euros
    :-)
    Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/01/15
    if only it would be that simple to calculate the real euro price
    Comment from jmke @ 2010/01/15
    since HD 5850 is priced at €220-230 it would be quite impossible for HD 5830 to be more expensive or priced the same
    Comment from leeghoofd @ 2010/01/15
    More aiming at around 190 euro's at launch, dropping to 160 euro region a few months later... but there were rumours at frst of a launch price sub 30 dollars then the current 4890 retail price... NOT
    Comment from jmke @ 2010/01/15
    English please I'm sure KMM doesn't understand a word of what you wrote there

    OT: I'm also guess €190 EURO, more expensive than HD 4890 (which is €170 in shops) but more features too;

     

    reply