Galaxy and Leadtek 9500 GT Tested and Compared

Videocards/VGA Reviews by massman @ 2008-08-04

We test two 9500 GT cards, one from Leadtek and one from Galaxy. We share with you our preliminary findings with these two sub $100 video cards who aim to take the performance/price crown at the entry level. Can these cards impress? How do they stack up to the 9600 GT and 8600 GT read on to find out.

  • prev
  • next

Synthetic 3D benchmarks

Futuremarks tests

These synthetic 3D benchmarks from Futuremark allow you to evaluate the expected performance of a system with different generations of games. As each 3DMark uses different features and quality settings, it allows you to get an idea of how your system will perform.

Madshrimps (c)Madshrimps (c)


3DMark01

3DMark01 has become more and more a system benchmark rather than a graphics card benchmark over the years. Nowadays, you can really see the difference in DDR2 and DDR3 memory setups, high and low FSB setups and so on.

Madshrimps (c)


3DMark03

3DMark03 is very GPU dependant, which comes down to: the more cores, the higher the score. SLI and CF performance increase is spectacular in this benchmark.

Madshrimps (c)


3DMark05

This product of the 3DMark series is again more CPU dependant than its predecessor, meaning that an overclocked CPU will have a big influence on the end score.

Madshrimps (c)


3DMark06

3DMark06 is known to stress the GPU to the maximum and provides SM2.0 and SM3.0 test to compare products.

Madshrimps (c)


Aquamark3

While this 3D benchmark is aging quickly, it still serves as a good evaluation tool for system performance, as it stresses the VGA, CPU and memory subsystem, any advantage had from a faster motherboard or memory setting will be apparent.

Madshrimps (c)


  • prev
  • next

No comments available.

 

reply