EK Supreme and Koolance CPU-340 Compared to The Competition

Cooling/Water Cooling by KeithSuppe @ 2008-04-16

Today we add two new blocks to our previous roundup, newcomer EK Supreme out of Slovenia and Koolance replacement to their CPU-330 the CPU-340.

  • prev
  • next

Koolance CPU-340

Koolance Nickel Plated CPU-340

Madshrimps (c)


Koolance has been around for over 8-years and recently they have been improving their product line to compete with other high-performance water-blocks and systems on the market. In the original round-up I tested their CPU-330 which is similar to the CPU-340, with the exception of applied materials to the metal surfaces. The CPU-330 was and is an impressive block featuring a hefty amount of copper in its base. Mass in any cooler can be used to good effect, although in a water-block it is sometimes a delicate balance. At the very least the CPU-330 out-weighed the other contenders at 198g in our 6-way Round-Up. Below we see the Gold coated copper base on CPU-330.

Madshrimps (c)


The CPU-340 is intended as an improvement over the CPU-330. Changes are primarily the application of materials used to coat the critical areas of the block such as the copper base-plate. As a comparison the photo below also shows a dollop of the preferred thermal paste for this addendum, Tuniq TX-2.

Madshrimps (c)


Looking at the blocks from a top view you can just make out Koolance utilized the Nickel coating on the innards of the CPU-340 as well. Although difficult to see from this view the CPU-340 is slightly smaller then the CPU-330. Why Koolance chose to replace Gold with Nickel perplexed me. Considering Nickel is pretty far down the Fourier based thermal conductivity scale. Perhaps their decision was based on an attempt to prevent dissimilar corrosive effects. However when looking at this anodic index Gold is about the best material out there?

Madshrimps (c)


As we peer into the blocks the extruded Pyramid pin design has been left in tact. The only difference is the Nickel plating or coating over the gold coated innards in the CPU-330.

Madshrimps (c)


In the original Round-Up I found Koolance mounting back-plate a bit strange in its absence of any material behind the socket? Just about all motherboards will flex provided enough tension is excreted and the reason these back-plates were introduced was to ensure tightening the mounting nuts increased mounting pressure. It almost looks as if Koolance back-plate might have the opposite effect?

Madshrimps (c)


My other criticism was the thickness of both the rear plate and rubber insulation? The back-plate is very thick at 3mm as is the rubber insulation at 2.5mm. It's intended to insulate the board from the hefty back-plate, however; it may also trap heat which would normally dissipate from the back of the socket. Seen below with the CPU-330 mounted note the gold coating on the base.

Madshrimps (c)


At first I found Koolance mounting hardware to be quite impressive, as time passes, testing with these blocks has shown their mounting hardware may actually sabotage their ability to perform optimally. Also included are several squares of thin copper "tape" for mounting thermistor, or thermo-probes.

Madshrimps (c)


I measure flatness using a metal drafting ruler/slide which has a very flat edge. The CPU-340 just like the CPU-330 passed this test and from the photo below the finish is excellent.

Madshrimps (c)


Onto the EK Supreme ->
  • prev
  • next
Comment from jmke @ 2008/04/16
This review of the EK Supreme also put it in the lead!
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/E...Supreme/5.html
Comment from thorgal @ 2008/04/16
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
This review of the EK Supreme also put it in the lead!
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/E...Supreme/5.html
A most impressive block indeed, but techpowerup didn't put on very stiff competition (best = TDX block which in our review is only average).

Other than that : great work Keith : you've rounded up what I believe are almost all the best cpu-blocks out there. I would like to see the Alphacool NexXxos highflow in between the others though, I own it myself and I wonder how it performs in comparison.
Comment from eva2000 @ 2008/04/17
thanks for the review!

would be interesting to see how dtek fuzion + 4.5mm nozzle would fair amongst the current results
Comment from jmke @ 2008/04/17
Keith your stock aircooling results are very impressive, below 60°C with overclocked Q6600 @ 3Ghz...

we've seen 90°C in closed case with stock Intel cooling at those speeds: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=5 96
Comment from thorgal @ 2008/04/17
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
Keith your stock aircooling results are very impressive, below 60°C with overclocked Q6600 @ 3Ghz...

we've seen 90°C in closed case with stock Intel cooling at those speeds: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=5 96
Yes, at 1,52Volts... A Q6600G0 can run 3Ghz @ stock voltage (or close).
Comment from Kougar @ 2008/04/17
Arctic Freezer 7 Pro + Q6600 G0 @1.20v @ 3.20GHz had Coretemp readings of 55-60c. Ambient roughly 23.3c. I think it speaks volumes about that test rig setup

Nice review, will have to keep my eye on both waterblocks. I wonder what will be out for Nehalem...

 

reply