2Mb and 8Mb cache size on HDs tested in RAID

Storage/HDD by jmke @ 2003-06-12

How does a 2mb cache harddisk compare to its bigger 8mb cache brother? We test them in different RAID setups, using real word benchmarks to show you the actual difference! Software RAID 0 / Hardware RAID 1 / 0 with Stripe sizes: 1 - 4 - 16 - 64 - 512.
HDTach/Sisoft Sandra/File Copying/UT2003

  • prev
  • next

Compare - HDTach

HDTach Comparison:

Madshrimps (c)


The average read speed takes a huge jump upwards when using RAID 0 with a smaller stripe size, while the write speeds only show minor improvements that increases with the use of bigger stripe sizes. The 1k stripe size even shows a big hit in write speeds, as the data is split between the 2 drives every other k!
The Raid1 setup shows read speeds on par with the none-raid benches, the write speeds take a minor hit, due to the fact that data needs to be written to 2 drives simultaneously.
The 8Mb cache does create a small advantage but nothing spectacular.

Madshrimps (c)


Not to be dismissed: the CPU power usage! A smaller stripe size equals bigger load on the CPU, with the exception of the 1k stripe size. RAID 1 also demands alot of the CPU when compared to the none-raid setup.
The 8Mb cache drives create a little more overhead for the CPU as during all tests it required 1-2% more CPU power.

Madshrimps (c)


Some mixed results for the Access time tests, the 2Mb has lower access times except for the one setup where the 8Mb cache has the best numbers. A stripe size of 64k seems to be sweet spot the 8Mb cache drive, while the 2Mb cache shows the best of itself with a 512k SS (stripesize).


Does Sandra give us different results? on to next page...

  • prev
  • next