Thermalright IFX-14 CPU Cooler Review

Cooling/CPU Cooling by jmke @ 2008-02-11

CPU coolers keep growing in size, this monster from Thermalright is proof of that. The Inferno Fire eXtinguisher is a heatsink large enough to accommodate up to three 140mm fans! Furthermore it comes with a separate smaller heatsink which sole purpose is to keep the backside of the CPU socket cool. Will this powerhouse CPU cooler grab first spot in our performance charts? Time to find out!

  • prev
  • Go to mainpage

Conclusive Thoughts

Performance Results Explained

Taking a closer look at the results of the IFX-14, the heatsink doesn’t fail to impress. In the high fan speed fan section the IFX-14 scores quite well, with the Delta 120x38mm 3200rpm fan the CPU temperature drops to an all time low of 37°C under full load! Using the slightly slower 2900rpm 120x25mm fan the results are on par with the Ultra-120, at 43.5°C.

Moving to the 120mm GlobalWin NCB at high the results are impressive, 2°C lower than its closest competitor, the Ultra-120, at this noise level of ~47.3dBA the IFX-14 is audible in a quiet room, but not intrusive, the performance is splendid, best we’ve seen yet.

The last test is with the silent 120mm NCB at 5v where the noise level drops to 39.7dBA and the system becomes whisper quiet. Here the IFX-14 truly dominates the performance charts, its massive surface area proves superior, ~5°C cooler than Ultra-120, Scythe Ninja and Coolink Silentator! At this noise level and with this heat output, a 5°C difference in a small closed case is impressive, as it currently stands, the IFX-14 is the best HSF in our ranking.

Our addendum test was done without active cool fan on the IFX-14, do note that the rear exhaust fan is in close proximity to the rear tower of the IFX-14. Either way, the performance results are most striking, you’d think that removing active CPU cooling would increase temperatures a lot, well, the IFX-14 kept the CPU at 56°C, that’s only one degree more than the Scythe Ninja who HAS active cooling!

Conclusive Thoughts

Thermalright has got a winner on their hands with the IFX-14 which beats the best heatsinks we’ve tested in the past, be it with very low CFM or medium CFM fans. Granted that at the high noise scale, the difference is a lot less stellar, and once you come into Delta/Vantec territory, where the dBA meter reads 70+dBA, the “smaller” Tower coolers with 120mm support catch up and surpass the IFX-14.

Nevertheless it’s the low noise performance which interests us most and there the IFX-14 is currently unbeatable, even without active cooling this monster heatsink doesn’t flinch, keeping our overclocked Prescott cooler than many other products.

Price wise the IFX-14 comes at a premium, available at PC-Cooling for €62.9 it’s a very expensive heatsink without a doubt. Our US readers can find the IFX-14 at Sidewinder Computers for $79.95, as you can see, it remains expensive no matter which side of the pond you live.

With many high end heatsinks available at half the price of the IFX-14 it wouldn’t be a very wise choice if you’re on a tight budget, but if you have money to spare and you’re looking for the best low noise heatsink, look no further. The IFX-14 is a high end product which comes recommended for its extreme performance, if you can afford it.

Recommended for


+ World Class Performance
+ Support for up to three 120/140mm fans
+ Can passively cool many of today’s CPUs

- Very high price
- Very big heatsink, possible compatibility issues in smaller cases
- Extra small heatsink will only fit in certain cases


We like to thank PC-Cooling.de for providing the test sample, unit next time!
  • prev
  • Go to mainpage
Comment from Rutar @ 2008/02/11
A Q6600 at 1.6V above 3 Ghz would be bette to test, 138W isn't that much for todays quadcore standards. I like those passive results tought.
Comment from geoffrey @ 2008/02/11
Jmke has been using Prescott all the way, it's not easy repeating every test, again and again, whenever a new generation of CPU's hit your local retailer. The Prescott is off the older generation Prescott CPU's and does produce quite an amount of heat for heatsinks to deal with, heck the high differences in our chart. Why would you want to use 1,6V with your air cooled Q6600, do you really want that extra clock in favor of such high voltage?
Comment from jmke @ 2008/02/11
what's the TDP of Intel's highest end Quad Core?
Comment from Rutar @ 2008/02/11
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
what's the TDP of Intel's highest end Quad Core?
125W stock, Overclocked and overvoltet, a lot more is possible.
Comment from jmke @ 2008/02/11
125W for Q6600? the QX6750 scores lower? what about QX9750 and QX9770 ?
Comment from Rutar @ 2008/02/11
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
125W for Q6600? the QX6750 scores lower? what about QX9750 and QX9770 ?
http://www.golem.de/0710/55669.html

130W
Comment from Faiakes @ 2008/02/11
Nice!
But I think if one has the Ultra 120 Extreme there is no real need to upgrade to the IFX, is there?
Comment from jmke @ 2008/02/11
will be testing the Ultra-120 eXtreme soon, not sure if the IFX-14 is an upgrade
Comment from Kougar @ 2008/02/12
Argh, was thinking that was the Extreme in those results. Was a shocking difference between the regular and the Extreme versions, so I suspect the IFX-14 isn't going to last very long at the top of those results....

 

reply