AutumnWave OnAir GT (USB HDTV Tuner) Review

Others/Miscelleneous by SidneyWong @ 2008-03-17

HDTV broadcast becomes more accessible in many cities AutumnWave is bringing to the notebook/laptop users an easy way to capture the high quality must watch sports or your favorite TV programs on-the-go

  • prev
  • Go to mainpage

Analog vs High Definition & Conclusive Thoughts

Analog v/s HDTV Reception:

It is difficult to describe how we individually perceive image color, sharpness, and crispness. However, if you remember how the old VHS tape performs versus today’s DVD movies I could "feel" the difference; this is what you would experience in TV broadcast and reception of analog to HD.

I took the AutumnWave OnAirGT with me to Cincinnati a month ago; where they have 5 free on-air HD TV broadcast channels. The difference was simply amazing. Since I am about 40 miles away from Chicago where HDTV broadcast is available at certain time of the day, I was unable to receive the signal.

I made a couple video clips; see if you could tell the difference. Bear in mind, the actual quality is much better.

Analog


High Definition


Thoughts:

I have been using the OnAir GT for a couple of months on and off. The winter weather in the Mid-West wasn't fun with snow storms damaging trees and power lines. My cable connection was down for almost a week; reception was marginal after the service was restored. The OnAir GT allows me to receive three channels via the tiny antenna. I only wish it has a signal booster to pull in more stations farther out.

I have to admit when Digital (High Definition) is available the picture quality is superior to analog by far. CPU usage was ~25% usage in my Dual Core Intel laptop with 2GB memory and onboard graphic. However, the CPU usage would be as high as 50-55% when I am browsing the internet and do some light office work such as Word or Excel using the laptop.

Using a desktop, again an Intel C2D @3Ghz speed and 8500GT graphic card, the CPU usage is down to 10% and no more than 15 browsing the internet and office work. I believe it has a lot to do with the graphic card taking up much of the work.

As for the full size remote control, I could live with a much smaller one with channel up/down, volume and on/off.

Conclusion :

The price is set rather high at about US$180. I am not quite sure if I would pack the remote control in my laptop bag. I certainly would like to see a place in the carrying case to include the USB cable, or I will be certain I forget to bring it with.

I no longer travel as much as before. When I did, I use "SlingPlayer". A device hooked up at home that allows me to watch my subscribe TV provider at home when I am away. For example, my trip to Asia last September I was watching all my favorite U.S. TV channels in Hong Kong from my laptop. But, I could not watch the local channels in Hong Kong.

OnAir GT will allow me to watch whatever I can pull in from local TV broadcast; both HD and Analog signals. Of course, I know I won't miss much when I travel within the country. With this in mind, "SlingPlayer" and "OnAir GT" are too different products aim at two different applications and usages, hence not competing with each other. Besides, there is no match on picture quality, the OnAir GT is far better than "SlingPlayer".

To sum up my feeling; I like the OnAir GT because it is easy to hook up, portable, provides excellent picture quality and HD ready. Yes, my nags; antenna booster, smaller remote and don't let me forget the USB cable.

+ Excellent picture quality
+ Bundled software
+ Digital HD ready
+ USB connectivity; ease of use

- Price

Madshrimps (c)
  • prev
  • Go to mainpage
Comment from geoffrey @ 2008/03/17
I can't see a difference between both media, video is way to low in resolution + video compression. Got any full resolution screen captures?
Comment from Sidney @ 2008/03/17
Double click and go to dailymotion with larger screen. Unless [M] server can hold the meg2 size, you will never going to have the resolution as like the real thing.

Anyone who watches HDTV will tell you the huge difference.
Comment from jmke @ 2008/03/17
normal TV is 480i at best, HD starts at 720p, huge difference
Comment from Sidney @ 2008/03/17
If I live within the city limit of Chicago or Cincinnati where on air HDTV is available, I would ditch my cable TV provider and go for free on air reception. In fact, I wouldn't even get a TV set but to use the PC & large screen LCD monitor instead.
Comment from geoffrey @ 2008/03/17
I know the difference is huge, that's not what I'm on to, I just think that high-res pictures would do better for comparison then low-res movies (even if you double click them for supersize ).
Comment from Sidney @ 2008/03/17
Quote:
Originally Posted by geoffrey View Post
I know the difference is huge, that's not what I'm on to, I just think that high-res pictures would do better for comparison then low-res movies (even if you double click them for supersize ).
Still at the mercy of the video cam resolutions; unless I use >720i video camera. Using a digital camera to take still picture from a vidio clip won't do it neither.
Comment from geoffrey @ 2008/03/17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney View Post
Still at the mercy of the video cam resolutions; unless I use >720i video camera. Using a digital camera to take still picture from a vidio clip won't do it neither.
Screencapture, no external device. I once used Hypercam to record video's, but it's a real resource hog, your HDTV playback may start to struggle. You can record using the aditional OnAIR software?
Comment from jmke @ 2008/03/17
recording is not the issue, finding suitable hosting for big HDTV movie is
Comment from geoffrey @ 2008/03/17
Where did I mention "movie"?
Comment from jmke @ 2008/03/18
Quote:
Originally Posted by geoffrey View Post
Screencapture, no external device. I once used Hypercam to record video's, but it's a real resource hog, your HDTV playback may start to struggle. You can record using the aditional OnAIR software?
?
Comment from geoffrey @ 2008/03/18
Post 2:

Quote:
Originally Posted by geoffrey View Post
I can't see a difference between both media, video is way to low in resolution + video compression. Got any full resolution screen captures?
I though I was being pretty clear there, I ment a screenshot "screen capture", not the movie "screen capture". K, eveybody following me now

I thought you needed software in order to take screenshots of movie's, that's why I mentioned Hypercam
Comment from jmke @ 2008/03/18
fraps should be able to do so too, smaller install
Comment from geoffrey @ 2008/03/18
Fraps needs a 3D appliciation in order to run properly, Hypercam doesn't.
Comment from jmke @ 2008/03/18
no it doesn't FRAPS can screenshot from any Direct Show application, this included Windows MEdia PLayer, ClassiC Player, PowerDVD, etc; Just start fraps, hit the screenshot hotkey and you'll get nice screencaps in your \fraps folder

just tried it, works perfect with the apps mentioned above
Comment from geoffrey @ 2008/03/18
WMV9 to then I suppose, I swear it didn't work playing mp3 files in WMV9, I'll have a look at it tomorrow again, really no time today

 

reply