4-Way Intel P35 Motherboard Overclocking Roundup

Motherboards/Intel S775 by massman @ 2007-11-26

In this group test we compare the overclocking capabilities and performance of 4 motherboards based on the mid-range P35 Intel chipset. From the low cost Asus P5K, affordable Foxconn P35AP-S and MSI Platinum Combo to the expensive DFI P35 Lanparty, which one will come out on top? Find out in this article.

  • next

Introduction

Introduction:

The P35 chipset has been around for quite a while and definitely gives an extra boost to your Intel CPU. A high front side bus combined with very decent memory tweaking pushes your system to the edge. Today, we have a look at the MSI Platinum Combo, the DFI P35 Lanparty, Foxconn's P35AP-S and the Asus P5K Vanilla.

MSI has always delivered decent motherboards for both AMD and Intel, whereas DFI, known for its fabulous S939 boards, has had some problems with the production of motherboards with an Intel chipset in the past. However, it seems that Oskar Wu has done some magic.

Oskar, known for his incredible work on Abit’s NF7-S and DFI’s NF4 series, was able to push the FSB of this motherboard beyond imagination, creating a big hype on the XtremeSystems forums. Click for the XtremeSystems forum thread. Foxconn is a relative newcomer to the end-user motherboard market, but has proven that it's capable of producing well-build boards with the Foxconn Mars series. Recently, they have enlisted Peter Tan, better known as Shamino, in order to get the most out of every board. Finally, Asus has already proven to be able to produce very big performers, especially Intel chipset based motherboards.

Madshrimps (c)
Insane FSB by Oscar Wu (click for verification link)


Note that both the CPU and motherboard are handpicked and the system was cooled by a cascade cooling system. This is not representable, not every system will be able to work at 600+ MHz FSB!

The DFI is built for the enthusiasts, whereas MSI is not very popular amongst the enthusiast’s community, though most boards are built up very decently, remember the Neo2 ? Both MSI and Foxconn sent us a board compatible with both DDR2 and DDR3. The Asus P5K has been around since the release of the P35 chipset.

Price/performance is important, so let’s find out if the less expensive motherboards can keep up with the high-end.

Enough speculation, time for pictures !
  • next
Comment from Rutar @ 2007/11/26
the madshrimps roundup attack on motherboard reviews, I'd be affraid if I was still writing the outdated one motherboard reviews


Foxconn really works on their street cred with that board
Comment from geoffrey @ 2007/11/26
Owning a P5K myself, good performance considering its price, and not too overloaded with BIOS features which hardly make a difference and are too complicated to understand for people who just jumped in.

Liked the article btw
Comment from Sidney @ 2007/11/26
Can't beat the Asus P5K board in both price and performance.
Comment from Massman @ 2007/11/27
You can by overclocking
Comment from jmke @ 2007/11/27
if you overclock,how will you beat the price/performance value? since FSB OCing hardly has any effect in real world applications
Comment from Rutar @ 2007/11/27
I think it would be more noticable with a Quadcore, where the Vdrop is more important.
Comment from Massman @ 2007/11/27
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
if you overclock,how will you beat the price/performance value? since FSB OCing hardly has any effect in real world applications
You and me have different definitions of overclocking . I see it as benching, you as cost-effective performance tweaking. In other words, I am willing to pay 45€ extra for a board which is faster, you're not.
Comment from thorgal @ 2007/11/28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Massman View Post
You and me have different definitions of overclocking . I see it as benching, you as cost-effective performance tweaking. In other words, I am willing to pay 45€ extra for a board which is faster, you're not.
I can second that, so am I But the majority of people are not, unfortunately for the hardware vendors
Comment from jmke @ 2007/11/28
but Massman, as a reviewer you'll have to look at both sides of the overclocking approach
Comment from Massman @ 2007/11/28
That's why the Price/Perfomance winner =/= High-end winner
Comment from jmke @ 2007/11/29
nope
Comment from Kougar @ 2007/12/02
45nm support on 975X chipsets is iffy, best to check on a individual board by board basis. Some sites have run 45nm chips on 975X ASUS boards however.

Interesting review! Am I correct that the ASUS P5k only has 3 vRegs? That's pitiful, no wonder there are reports that Quadcores would kill the thing. Does explain the 0.1v vdroop problem too, my own 3vReg DS3 had about that same vdroop also with a E6300. To bad Gigabyte didn't show up to the party.

 

reply