Very Affordable ATI card from Powercolor, the Radeon HD 2400XT

Videocards/VGA Reviews by geoffrey @ 2007-07-23

Shortly after releasing their long waited HD 2900 XT, ATI announced a new generation of mid-range and low-end graphic accelerators, the HD 2600 and HD 2400 series. The HD 2600 series follow up the X1600 and are ATI´s next best mid-range product while the HD 2400 series are meant for the entry level gamers among us. We take a look at Powercolor´s HD 2400 XT, the fastest in ATI´s HD2400 line-up, to find out what kind of graphic details can be expected with this low cost video card.

  • prev
  • next

Powercolor HD2400XT

Powercolor HD2400XT

Inside the box you should find:
  • Manual
  • DVI to HDMI adapter
  • S-video to AV adapter
  • Driver CD

The card itself is very small compared to the high-end boys I've been reviewing past months, though nothing special compared to other entry level stuff. The amount of components found on this card is kept very low, while this is certainly cost reducing we hope that our card remains stable at any given moment. For their HD 2400 XT Powercolor chose for active cooling by combining a small black heatsink with a low quality 40mm fan. This made this card a single slot solution which shouldn't cause problems during install.

Madshrimps (c)


At the back of the card we didn't find any additional power connectors. The jumper you'll see is of no use for the average pc enthusiast and could also be found on other ATI vga cards to select the PAL/NTSC standard for TV-Out. Actually a small sized dip-switch is used most often instead of this jumper, though using a classic jumper will certainly reduce the extra costs even further.

Madshrimps (c)


On each side of the PCB two memory IC's have been placed, and as you can see on the picture below those chips don't come with any kind of heatsink/fan cooling solution. The black heatsink found on the front of the card doesn't provide additional cooling for the front mem-IC's, these are DDR2 and don’t really needed when used at lower clock speeds.

As stated on ATI's site these cards also come with support for CrossFire graphics, but no additional CF connectors have been added and so the cards have to fall back to the systems PCIe bus. Though, with cards like these it's very questionable why we would ever need CrossFire as it probable isn’t a better choice compared to a single mid-range HD 2600.

Madshrimps (c)


Powercolor's cooling gear is mounted through 4 mounting holes located in a square around the GPU, mounting pressure is applied by 4 bolts which can be found on the back of the card. Between the HD 2400 XT's GPU core and the heatsink Powercolor applied white thermal goop which is just perfect for this kind of application. If one should want to improve cooling ability's you should definitely look into replacing the low profile heatsink.

Madshrimps (c)


The R610 GPU uses the same architecture technologies of R600 GPU found on the HD 2900 XT, that way DirectX 10 compatible programmable shaders become available for the entry level market. Compared to the high-end R600 transistor count has been reduced from 700 million transistors to around 180 million and by using the smaller 65nm fabrication process it's without doubt a few times less power hungry then its high-end counterpart. The down side here is that the amount of stream processors also falls back from 320 to only 40 parallel processing units.

Madshrimps (c)


Hynix DDR memory is very popular on VGA cards, on this HD 2400 XT we found four HY5RS123235FP GDDR3 chips each good for 64MB resulting in a total available memory space of 256MB. The chips below are rated for 700MHz DDR at 2.00V, though with 0.20 extra volts they should do just fine up to 900MHz, overclockers will be satisfied with the headroom left in those chips.

Madshrimps (c)


Classic 9 pins Sub-D and DVI connections can be found together with an S-Video connector. HDMI is available by using the included DVI to HDMI adapter and with 5.1 surround sound onboard this card has more to offer then we've ever thought!

Madshrimps (c)


Let's go onto the test setup and benchmarks ->
  • prev
  • next
Comment from jmke @ 2007/07/23
Noteworthy for the HDTV fans:
We have already explored Silicon Optix HD HQV in detail. The tests and what we are looking for in them have not changed since our first round. Fortunately, the ability of NVIDIA and AMD hardware to actually perform the tasks required of HD HQV has changed quite a bit.

Both AMD and NVIDIA told us to expect scores of 100 out of 100 using their latest drivers and hardware. We spent quite a bit of time and effort in fully evaluating this test. We feel that we have judged the performance of these solutions fairly and accurately despite the fact that some subjectivity is involved. Here's what we've come up with.


The bottom line is that NVIDIA comes out on top in terms of quality. We've seen arguments for scoring these cards differently, but we feel that this is the most accurate representation of the capabilities offered by each camp.

On the low end, both AMD and NVIDIA hardware begin to stumble in terms of quality. The HD 2400 XT posts quite a lack luster performance, failing in noise reduction and HD deinterlacing (jaggies). But at least it poorly deinterlaces video at full resolution. We excluded tests of NVIDIA's 8500 series, as their video drivers have not yet been optimized for their low end hardware. Even so, we have been given indications not to expect the level of performance we see from the 8600 series. We would guess that the 8500 series will perform on par with the AMD HD 2400 series, though we will really have to wait and see when NVIDIA releases a driver for this.

Source: http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3047&p=3
Comment from Gamer @ 2007/07/23
Nice review, complete and very good !!
Got some trouble with this though :
Quote:
At 46,7 dBA we can't say that this card is one of the most silent VGA cards I ever tested
Quote:
- Noisy
?
Comment from jmke @ 2007/07/23
"bij 46.7dBa kunnen we niet zeggen dat dit een van de meest stille VGA kaarten was dat we al getest hebben"

we can't say.
Comment from Gamer @ 2007/07/23
Great, just great
Comment from jmke @ 2007/07/23
que?
I clarified the sentence a bit, no more confusion now
Comment from Gamer @ 2007/07/23
I guess I need some spectacles, that's it

 

reply