XFX Geforce 7600GT Fatal1ty - Cooler and Faster than others

Videocards/VGA Reviews by geoffrey @ 2007-01-12

With the official release of the NVIDIA G80 based high end video cards in November last year, it is only a matter of months before we see new mid-range mayhem released for every budget minded gamer out there. At the very last moment XFX decided to satisfy gamers with one of the last G70 based video cards, their 7600GT Fatal1ty edition features passive cooling and faster clock speeds at a competitive price. How much faster? We find out.

  • prev
  • next

Call of Duty 2

Call of Duty 2
Official website

The sequel of Call of Duty was released last year and features a whole new graphics engine which really put you in the middle of a war zone in all its terrifying glory. The gameplay is more newbie friendly with the auto-healing and easier to kill enemies, nevertheless with the difficulty cranked up you’ll have many auto-spawning foes to kill.

We've chosen to play the "Hold the line" scene which is at the beginning of the "Battle of El Alamain" level. You find yourself in the dusk racing the Germans to get hold of a little town in the desert. Unfortunately, both armies hit the town at the same time, so there is quite some chaos in the beginning. In order to have good benchmark results I started to record frames from the very first second the scene plays. You are on your way to the little town, and there are Germans on your left and right. Just let the truck driver do his work and you do yours: shoot!

Madshrimps (c)

Madshrimps (c)


The Fatal1ty has a nice lead over the reference 7600GT, making the game playable even up to 4xAA, which noticeably reduces the aliasing in-game. I also tried 2xAA but found the reduction in IQ not worth the small increase in FPS, with 4xAA the XFX is able to pump out enough frames to keep gameplay fluent.

Madshrimps (c)

Madshrimps (c)


This resolution might be a stretch for the 7600GT series, while the XFX has a lead over the reference card, it’s not large enough to make the game really enjoyable even without AA enabled.
  • prev
  • next
Comment from SuAside @ 2007/01/12
i kinda miss a X1950Pro thrown into the mix... (and a real case )
Comment from jmke @ 2007/01/12
X1950Pro is out the 7600GT league, the 7900GS is the X1950Pro match which Geoffrey compared earlier here: http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=523
Comment from Massman @ 2007/01/12
I really like the card's specs, 80nm should be one good overclocker
Comment from jmke @ 2007/01/12
SusAside, you might have a point, the X1950Pro performs quite on par with the 7600GT in this review: http://www.trustedreviews.com/graphi...1ty-7600-GT/p4
Comment from HitenMitsurugi @ 2007/01/13
Depends on what graph and game you're looking at, and what the bottleneck in the system is

upping res/AA gives you this:
http://www.trustedreviews.com/images...924-graph9.gif

Which is another extreme case, i know, but just as valid. The problem is that they don't mention the system test configuration
If you look at how cs:source scales, you see a big cpu bottleneck at 1280x1024, with all the cards performing the same, and only some spacing apart as the resolution increases. If you'd only look at that one resolution, you'd draw the wrong conclusions.

and the price difference isn't that big, in germany u can find x1950pro's for €165 for the bog standard cards, but a more general pricerange is €180-200

edit: ah yes they do: "To test I used our standard selection of benchmarks in our reference Intel 975XBX “Bad Axe” motherboard, with an Intel X6800 Core 2 Duo, coupled with 2GB of Corsair CMX1024-6400C4 running at 800MHz with latency settings of 4-4-4-12." Strange that even that processor bottlenecks these mid range cards.
Comment from SuAside @ 2007/01/13
well, it might be 35 euros more expensive, but it's still ATI's best mainstream card (price/performance). a comparison with that is always educational i'd say (and a good reference).
Comment from jmke @ 2007/01/13
the 7600GT is competitor to X1650XT in fact, as seen in this review: http://www.madshrimps.be/vbulletin/s...ad.php?t=29022

unfortunately Geoffrey changed test configs, so he couldn't reuse the numbers of his X1950Pro tests, the cards have been since send back to companies.
Comment from flokel @ 2007/01/28
Can somebody tell me how high the 7600gt fatality is ?

I'm worried if the card fits in my silverstone lc-16m

regards,
Flo
Comment from geoffrey @ 2007/01/30
Height
Zalman HD135 ---> 135mm
Silverstone LC-16M ---> 170mm

XFX 7600GT Infin1ty ----> +-150mm

Should fit in there.
Comment from jmke @ 2007/07/10
* Cheapest "stock" 7600 GT is now only €79
http://www.alternate.de/html/product...wTechData=true
* The Fatality version is only €119
http://www.alternate.de/html/product...wTechData=true

* Cheapest "stock" 8600 GT €99
http://www.alternate.de/html/product...wTechData=true
* OC'd XFX 8600 GT €119
http://www.alternate.de/html/product...l?artno=JAXXHB
* XFX Fatality 8600 GT €149
http://www.alternate.de/html/product...wTechData=true

will be interesting to compare these cards, don't ya think will be testing them the coming week; shown down of NVIDIA low/mid end

 

reply