Silverstone ST40EF PSU Review: Power Through Efficiency

Cases & PSU/Power Supplies by Berry @ 2006-12-08

Equipped with a new generation of design and components, the Element ST40EF continues SilverStone´s stride toward more efficient power supplies, with higher than 80% efficiency across all loading conditions.

  • prev
  • next

Test Setup & Load Results

Test Setup

For the tests I used a setup that would run near the maximum ability of the power supply. All energy efficiency options in the bios, and in Windows are turned OFF. For comparison I used my old OCZ Powerstream 520 with a typical efficiency of 70 to75%.

The hardware and their rated power consumption:

  • AMD X2-4800 @2600 (260X10@1,42V) rated near ~125W
  • DFI RDX200-CF ~65W
  • ATI Radeon X800XTPe ~100W
  • 2x 1gb Team Special CE5 260-2,5-3-2-7@2,85V ~30W
  • 2x Maxtor Max9 160GB SATA ~15W each
  • 2x Maxtor Max10 250GB ATA Raid0 ~15W each
  • 1x Optical Drive ~20W
  • 3x 12cm Silverstone FM121 @ 7v ~15W

    The total maximum power consumption is slightly over 400W, with a total of ~415W. Keep in mind though these are Peak-loads, so real-life loads are lower for sure.

    Measurements

    All measurements where repeated three times, voltages and amperage on the AC-line were measured using a Multimeter/Amps-clamp, a PeakTech3130 which has a MAX (High-hold) function making it easy to measure and note the highest peaks, which are used for the calculations.

    Madshrimps (c)


    The internal Volt-lines where measured using a Fluke Multimeter, Vhigh/low for each line were noted.

    Some Calculations:

    Ideally the math would be:

    P = U x I

    P= Power (W)
    U= Voltage (V)
    I= Current (A)

    In real life, there is energy loss, due to various reasons. Resulting in the following:

    P= U x I x efc
    efc= efficiency

    In older and cheaper power supplies efficiency is typically ~70%, so making the jump to 80% could save you money. For me it’s not about the money though, I’m only interested in stability and performance.

    Performance results

    First measurement was done in Power-off

    Madshrimps (c)


    Both power supplies gave the same current, at 0,08A @ 226,4V resulting in a consumption of 18W in stand-by.

    Second measurement was done during boot-up.

    Madshrimps (c)


    The third measurement, during desktop mode, with 0% core, and waiting for ½ an hour to exclude any influence of programs running in the background.

    Madshrimps (c)



    Fourth measurement was done, using S&M 1.5.2. Goal of this test is to generate 100% load on both cores.

    Madshrimps (c)


    For the fifth measurement, I have used various 3d tests, to determine which test resulted in the highest load possible. For my X800XTPe, it is 3Dmark05, that gives a 0,15A higher overall load, when compared to 3Dmark03 or 3Dmark06.

    Madshrimps (c)


    For my sixth test, I ran a Disk – to – Raid0 (Sata2-Ata3+4) copy of a 4Gb photomap, with pictures of 3,4-4,3Mb each, giving a highest reproducible load, during disk activity.
    Core-load ranged around 15-21%.

    Madshrimps (c)



    For my final run, I combined all relevant runs:
  • S&M 1.5.2 CPU FPU for Core0
  • 3Dmark05 default
  • Disk – to – Raid0 copy

    The generated load was the highest I could achieve, and 100% stable on both supplies.

    Madshrimps (c)



    • prev
    • next
    Comment from Feargeber @ 2006/12/13
    ooh, I read this article about the ST40EF. Very nice.

    I think this will be my next PSU for my HTPC case. Sounds very good.
    I wanted to kick out my old Noname PSU in any way, as it is getting too loud.

    Now I read, that even efficiency is very interesting in new PSU's.
    over 80%, thats great, I do not want to know, how less efficiency my noname has......

    Thanks for the Review and the informations guys.
    Comment from jmke @ 2006/12/13
    glad you liked the reivew Feargeber and welcome to the forums

     

    reply