Mid-Range VGA Mayhem - ATI and NVIDIA compared

Videocards/VGA Reviews by geoffrey @ 2006-12-12

Following our mid/high end roundup we explore the performance of mid-range products from HIS, Powercolor and Sparkle. Which VGA card can provide you with the most bang for the buck? Do you fancy silence and power at an acceptable price, keep on reading.

  • prev
  • next

Technology: ATI vs NVIDIA

ATI X1950 Pro

Madshrimps (c)


ATI's X1950 Pro is based on their RV570 GPU. Basically: 36 shader processors (12x3), 8 geometry pipelines and 12 ROP's. The core speed is being kept at 575MHz (reference design), and the memory is finding itself at 1380MHz. Besides the lower power consumption compared to RV580 the X1950 Pro supports dongle-less Crossfire, something that looks very familiar to nVidia's SLI technology.

Madshrimps (c)


A second processing chip we can find on the X1950 Pro is ATI's Rage Theater. In fact ATI gave the choice to the vendors whether they want to add this chip or not. Both HIS and Powercolor graphic boards used in our review came with the Rage Theater processor. The ATI Rage Theater chip is used for creating high quality video in- and output. You can find more info on AMD/ATI's site.

Madshrimps (c)


The main GPU is based on unified shader processors. By this we mean that there are no longer individual pixel and vertex shaders. The 'unified' shaders have the possibility to work as a vertex shader, or as a pixel shader, all of that completely dependant of what scene has to be rendered. This will certainly improve performance since there will be no shader processor doing 'nothing'. Only in the later introduction of the G80 we see NVIDIA choosing for the same approach in graphic processing.

NVIDIA 7900 GS

Madshrimps (c)


Sparkle's 7900GS is using the NVIDIA G71 video processor, a die shrink of te G70 in other words. The G71 has been well used (on NVIDIA's 7950GT for example) on other products going from mid to the very high end. This time NVIDIA is not using the full potential of the G71 cores: with 20 out of 24 vertex shader, and 7 out of a total of 8 pixel shaders, the 7900GS will be significant slower then the 7950GT we reviewed before. Not only that, the core and memory speed has also been lowered to 450/1320 MHz.

GeForce 7800GTX
GeForce 7900GS
GeForce 7900GT
GeForce 7950GT
GeForce 7900GTX
Productionprocess
110nm
90nm
90nm
90nm
90nm
Pixel pipelines
8
7
8
8
8
Vertex pipelines
24
20
24
24
24
ROP's
16
16
16
16
16
GPU core clock
430 MHz
450 MHz
450 MHz
550 MHz
650 MHz
Memory clock
1200 MHz
1320 MHz
1320 MHz
1400 MHz
1600 MHz
Amount of memory
256Mb
256Mb
256Mb
512Mb
512Mb
Memory bus width
256 bit
256 bit
256 bit
256 bit
256 bit




ATI vs NVIDIA

HIS X1950Pro IceQ 3 Turbo
PowerColor X1950 PRO Extreme
Sparkle GeForce 7900 GS
Cooling
IceQ 3
Arctic Cooling
stock
GPU / Process
RV570 / 80nm
RV570 / 80nm
G71 / 90nm
GPU clock
620 MHz *
600 MHz
450 MHz
Memory clock
1480 MHz
1400 MHz
1320 MHz
Shader Units
36
36
20
Geometry pipelines
8
8
7
ROP's
12
12
16
Memory
Samsung 1.4ns 256Mb bit GDDR3
Samsung 1.4ns 256Mb bit GDDR3
Hynix 1.4ns 256Mb bit GDDR3
Amount of memory
256Mb (8x64Mb)
256Mb (8x64Mb)
256Mb (8x64Mb)
DirectX version
9.0C
9.0C
9.0C
Vertex and Pixel Shader version
3
3
3
Native Display Quality
10-bit
10-bit
8-bit
Anisotropic Filtering
All stage Trilinear (16X)
All stage Trilinear (16X)
1st stage Trilinear (16X)
Full (HQ) Anisotropic Filtering
Yes
Yes
No
Maximum MSAA
12X Temporal
12X Temporal
4X
Adaptive AA
6X
6X
4X Transparency AA
Always on FSAA Gamma correction
Yes
Yes
No
HDR + AA
Yes
Yes
No
3DC+
Yes
Yes
No
FP16 Blending
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dual Link DVI
2
2
1
H.264 support
Yes
Yes
No
Dual GPU support
CrossFire
CrossFire
SLI
Bus Type
PCI Express
PCI Express
PCI Express

*Although HIS stated the core to be clocked at 620MHz, our monitoring tool shows us that it was actually clocked at 635MHz.

Let's find out who's how capable they are when it comes to gaming ->
  • prev
  • next
Comment from Rutar @ 2006/12/12
Intresting cooler choice from Powercolor
Comment from jort @ 2006/12/12
No discuss in the forum link textie on conclusion?
Comment from jmke @ 2006/12/12
linkie has been integrated into the header of the article for the past 10 articles and future ones

see picture below (bottom right)
Comment from jort @ 2006/12/12
Ohh i notice now, been used to it now for a couple years so thats why i wondered tnx for teh info

 

reply