Asus P5W DH Deluxe/WiFi In-Depth Overclocking Review

Motherboards/Intel S775 by KeithSuppe @ 2007-06-22

Asus has engineered their way into the hearts of Overclockers and the homes of PC-Users the world over. Asus pioneered the OEM market, introducing “Enthusiast” style motherboards long before the phrase “PC-Enthusiast” was coined. Asus motherboards are synonymous with overclocking and the P5W DH Deluxe/WiFi is no exception.

  • prev
  • next

Layout - Power Circuitry

P5W DH Deluxe landscape


Madshrimps (c)


Asus chose to revise their 8-phase power circuitry just slightly, to better accommodate Core 2 Duo's lower voltage requirements. Stepping Vcore down from 12V it's imperative to supply the processor with clean, uninterruptible power. Any "excess" current will be dissipated as heat, hence the elaborate mosfet cooling. In this respect Asus has done their homework and one reason the board is so stable while overclocking.

Madshrimps (c)


What confused me was Asus choice to use a "P4" 4-pin 12V connector to rather then an 8-pin EPS, especially given the wide-range of processors the P5W DH supports. Currently most P5W DH owners are running the Core 2 Duo which ahs a low 65W TDP, however; the official support lists includes Presler and other 130W TDP processors.

Madshrimps (c)


Years ago I spoke of the amount of mass required to adequately dissipate energy from what were then very high TDP based CPU's such as Presler and Smithfield. As pipe-lines deepened, transistor counts increased and all this was shrinking with each die revision temperatures climbed drastically requiring more mass to dissipate this energy. Mainboard real-estate could not expand beyond ATX limits therefore CPU heatsink architecture had only way to grow, straight up. Hence the Tower Cooler was born and some approach a kilogram, that's over 2-pounds hanging from your socket once the case is turned upright. What confounds me is that air-coolers even in the presence of the Core Duo with less then half the TDP of Presler still remain massive? Take the massive Tuniq 120 which was reviewed in our CPU Heatsink Roundup May 2006 and seen below.

Madshrimps (c)


Weighing in at a massive 789g without the fan, this cooler is nearly 400g beyond the recommended weight limit for Socket-T. Water blocks by comparison weigh in at about 1/8th that of these behemoths and will drop your processor temps much lower. Nonetheless Asus has provided plenty of room around the socket area for their P5W DH so you can mount just about anything your heart desires.

Madshrimps (c)


Onto North Bridge cooling...>>
  • prev
  • next
Comment from Massman @ 2007/06/22
Wow, that's one great review. GJ L3D
Comment from merrygoround @ 2007/06/23
Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first set out to ........
Comment from Unknown Soldier @ 2007/06/24
Hi,

I did 8000+ memory bandwidth(according to everest) on my P5W DH Deluxe on aircooling(Stock Intel Fan) with my Q6600 and had 1333 FSB at 3000Mhz(333x9) at 333Mhz 4.4.4.11 memory and also just got under 8000 memory bandwidth with 418Mhz 5.5.5.15 memory. Memory is Team Elite DDR2-800 which is rated at the settings above at 2.3-2.375.

I got pics etc. but will post tomorrow if I remember.

I'm outta here for the moment.

Enjoy.

US
Comment from Liquid3D @ 2007/06/29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unknown Soldier View Post
Hi,

I did 8000+ memory bandwidth(according to everest) on my P5W DH Deluxe on aircooling(Stock Intel Fan) with my Q6600 and had 1333 FSB at 3000Mhz(333x9) at 333Mhz 4.4.4.11 memory and also just got under 8000 memory bandwidth with 418Mhz 5.5.5.15 memory. Memory is Team Elite DDR2-800 which is rated at the settings above at 2.3-2.375.

I got pics etc. but will post tomorrow if I remember.

I'm outta here for the moment.

Enjoy.

US
PLease do And thank you all for your comments !
Comment from Unknown Soldier @ 2007/07/17
Hi, Sorry for the late reply.

Well originally I was using my Mobo's(Intel 975 Asus P5W DH Deluxe) auto mode and got the memory at 416.8FSB as per pic below. Note FSB/CPU running 4:5 ratio at 3Ghz.



But I then to o/c my CPU myself and got better results.

3Ghz air with 1:1 ratio at 333FSB


At 3.2Ghz on air with 1:1 ratio at 356.4FSB - 8800GTS o/c to extreme on default air


At this moment I run my CPU at 3Ghz as below .. but get just over 12000+ 3dMark06 since I installed the Zalman 9700 Cooler.



Running 3.2Ghz runs hot but still stable.

US
Comment from Unknown Soldier @ 2007/07/18
My best Overclocks

Intel Q6600 B3 @ 3.2Ghz (9x)
Asus P5W DH Deluxe Bios 2004 Intel 975X 1426Mhz
Asus GTS8800 320MB @ 675/936
Team Elite 800Mhz 4x1Ghz - 356Mhz(712)
Zalman CNPS9700L CPU Cooler
WindowsXP 32-Bit
3DMark06 - 12415
Comment from SuAside @ 2007/07/27
already posted this a good while ago elsewhere, but seems suited here.

E6400 (2.13ghz) @ 3200Mhz with 1600fsb 1:1 and memory at 4-4-4-12 gives me a 17.6s 1M SuperPi with cores running 24°c i might add. NB is a lil' hot though in the summer.
Comment from Unknown Soldier @ 2007/07/29
Q6600 B3 @ 3.4Ghz stable .. does 3DMark06



I got it as high as 3.5Ghz in Windows but it wouldn't complete 3DMark06.

Been playing games and all at 3.4Ghz ... very stable. Notice the cool temps.

My Zalman 9700


US

 

reply