Intel Core 2: Is high speed memory worth its price?

Memory by piotke @ 2006-08-01

Does the Intel Core 2 need fast DDR2 memory to perform at its best? In this article we compare different memory speed and timings to provide you with the answer. Read on to find if cheap memory is enough to feed the Conroe.

  • prev
  • next

Benchmarks: Applications and Games

Benchmarks: Applications
(Results in percentage increase/decrease over slowest PC3200 (DDR2 400) CL5-5-5-15 modules)


The Photoshop benchmark from Driverheaven performs a series of actions on a large photo and displays the time it takes.

Madshrimps (c)


Tight timings are the key for this benchmark, which give you a boost of up to 4%... not impressive.

Benchmarks: Games
(Results in percentage increase/decrease over slowest PC3200 (DDR2 400) CL5-5-5-15 modules)


F.E.A.R. has an in-game performance benchmark which we used here, details were set to low game and resolution to 800x600, this offloads the video card and stresses the CPU/Memory/Motherboard more.

Madshrimps (c)


Even at this none GPU limited setting the maximum increase is only 6%, and you can see it becoming a trend with PC5300 performing lower than the expected.

The ID Software engines always been very good benchmark tools to measure system performance, at 800x600 we got these results:

Madshrimps (c)


Well, here the results almost reflect those got from the synthetic Sisoft Sandra benchmark, if you play Quake 4 at these settings with your high end video card, be sure to get high end memory! ;-)

However if you do want to turn up the eye candy and get the most from your system, you might find that the increase in memory bandwidth for your Core 2 is not paying off:


Madshrimps (c)


Let?s warp things up ->
  • prev
  • next