Gaming Benchmarks-Thenext24-jmke-4480.png)
-Thenext24-jmke-4481.png)
The FX-53 continues to lead in Doom 3, however the margins are slim at best. The 3200+ is able to demonstrate a better lead over the 3400+ and 3500+ than is the FX-53 over the 3200+. At higher resolution the game is more graphics bound and CPU speed becomes less relevant. Although leads persist, they are generally smaller except the 3400+ drops about 10fps to the socket 939 processors.
-Thenext24-jmke-4482.png)
-Thenext24-jmke-4483.png)
UT2003 benches paint a muddled picture. The 3400+ hangs in there with the 939 chips and even wins a few at 2GHz speeds. After overclocking the 3400+’s lack of memory bandwidth becomes a slight problem and the 3200+ and FX-53 pull ahead slightly. The 3200+ just seems to get stronger and pull closer to the FX-53 as HTT speeds increase. The 3500+ is generally left as the trailing candidate to the other CPUs.
-Thenext24-jmke-4484.png)
-Thenext24-jmke-4485.png)
Here we see somewhat of a surprising result. The 3400+ socket 754 just wipes the floor with the 939 chips. Whereas the 3400+ is blessed with 1mb L2 cache and could potentially explain why it is faster than the 3200+/3500+ CPUs, there is no good reason why the 3400+ is faster than the FX-53. I am going to guess that either there is something well optimized in the Chaintech/3400+ combo or something is amiss in my MSI 939 setup in regards to the UT2004 3D game engine.
-Thenext24-jmke-4486.png)
-Thenext24-jmke-4488.png)
Far Cry1.1 with the non overclocked CPUs is showing similar results to previous game benchmarks. In Research we see the FX-53 trailed by the 3200+, then followed by the 3400+ and 3500+ respectively. In PC Games Hardware Demo the 3400+ bests the 3200+ at low resolution, but after 1024x768 the 3200+ is winning, and by 1280x1024 the 3400+ is beat by all 3 other processors. The FX-53 again takes the crown, with the 3200+ nipping at its heels
-Thenext24-jmke-4487.png)
-Thenext24-jmke-4489.png)
While overclocked the distinction between the FX-53 and the 3200+ fades and we are left with virtually identical numbers. Each CPU trades barbs and in both Research and Hardware demos the 3200+ leaves the parting shot with the very minor win.
Unfortunately for the 3400+, in the overclocked setting the higher ram bandwidth of the 939 chips is overshadowing an otherwise good showing. The 3400+ may have performed better if I could have gotten some ram to run 1:1 at 250HTT on the Chaintech. However, due to clearance issues with the Thermalright XP-120 and difficulty in scaling ram at higher HTT speeds on a 754 board this just wasn’t possible for us to do in this review.
Onto our conclusion ->