Intel P4 Aircooling - Heatsink Roundup Q4 2004

Cooling/CPU Cooling by jmke @ 2004-10-28

In this roundup we compare 13 different P4 heatsinks made by Thermalright, Coolermaster, Scythe, Speeze, Swiftech, Evercool, Aerocool and TTIC. Using different fans at low and high speed we try to find the best bang for the buck, best performer and most silent heatsink out there.

  • prev
  • next

Results: Passive & Extra's

Passive tests:

Madshrimps (c)


I placed the 120mm Papst 30cm away from the CPU and aimed it at a predefined angle towards the heatsink, the 120mm Papst delivers 40CFM at 18dBA, so only a minimal amount of air turbulence was created. A more extensive article with in-case testing is scheduled for release next month so look at these numbers as a guideline, they are not definitive.

Only the NCU2000 was designed for passive cooling, but I though it would be interesting to see how the other large heatsinks would handle P4 when they were passively cooled.

P4 @ 2000Mhz – 1.65v vcore

Madshrimps (c)


The NCU2000 does what it is supposed to do, very good. No other heatsink comes close, although the XP-120 is showing impressive numbers. The Hyper6 is handicapped due to the metal fan bracket which blocks most of the air from passing through its copper fins. Aerocool’s DP-102 is very close to critical temperatures.

P4 @ 2400Mhz – 1.65v vcore

Madshrimps (c)


When we add 400Mhz to the clockspeed all results increase quite linearly with ~5°C, the DP-102 drops of the list, while the Hyper6 is running very close to the limit.

Overall I was quite surprised by the results of XP-120, which provided impressive numbers when compared to the NCU2000.


Detail test: XP-90 vs SP-94

Since the XP-90 was touted as the SP-94 killer, here are all the different results I obtained in one graph, color coded for your viewing pleasure

Madshrimps (c)


What conclusion can we draw from the above numbers?

  • 80/92mm @ High: SP-94 takes the lead
  • 80mm @ Low: comparable performance
  • 92mm @ Low: XP-90 takes the lead

    Now remember that comment I made on the SP-94 detail page about heatsink orientation:

    Horizontal gives best performance, while vertical will give 1-2°C higher results.

    Let’s take worse case scenario and add 2°C to the results of the SP-94:

    Madshrimps (c)


  • 80/92mm @ High: SP-94 lead is reduced
  • 80mm @ Low: comparable results
  • 92mm @ Low: the XP-90's lead increases

    Since most users are moving away from small, noisy fans the XP-90 will accommodate their needs excellently, providing better performance with large low speed fans when compared to the SP-94.

    With all the results compared it is time for a summary and conclusion ->
    • prev
    • next