Aquamark 2.3 benchmarkBenchmark was run with standard settings.
After each run there was a reboot
|
3.4 Catalyst | 3.5 Catalyst | 3.6 Catalyst | 3.7 Catalyst | 3.8 Catalyst | 3.9 Catalyst |
1600x1200 | 24.2 | 24.3 | 24.3 | 24.3 | 24.1 | 24.3 |
No difference here, only a small difference between the different drivers
|
3.4 Catalyst | 3.5 Catalyst | 3.6 Catalyst | 3.7 Catalyst | 3.8 Catalyst | 3.9 Catalyst |
1280x1024 | 33.8 | 34.3 | 33.8 | 33.8 | 33.9 | 33.7 |
At 1280x1024 the 3.5 driver stands out, while the rest produce only a very small difference.
|
3.4 Catalyst | 3.5 Catalyst | 3.6 Catalyst | 3.7 Catalyst | 3.8 Catalyst | 3.9 Catalyst |
1024x768 | 49.0 | 50.4 | 50.1 | 50.0 | 49.9 | 50.4 |
Again the 3.5 which performs the best closely followed by ATI’s latest 3.9.
In conclusion for Aquamark 2.3, stick to the 3.9, it performs the best in 2 out the 3 resolutions tested.