Madshrimps News and interesting articles and howtos from the Web!Articles and Reviews, CPU Coolers, Cases, Motherboards, Videocards and more...Howto and guides on Modding and Optimising your PCFollow Interesting Discussions at our Forums!Find out more About Madshrimps and its crewStatistics - What article/howto is most popular and more!
[M]adness
HWFaq Hardware and Software Frequently Asked Questions - HWFaq
Contests Win Hardware! Join our contests now!
Search
Links
Sponsors
Send News
Video Card Comparison Charts

Intel Core i7 In-Depth Performance Scaling Analysis

Aircooled Heatsink Reviews

35x 120mm Fans Tested

Sponsors
.Priorweb
Arctic Silver
Asus
Caseking
CoolerMaster
Danger Den
Dollarshops
Geeks.com
Gigabyte
MSI
OCZ
PC-Cooling
Scythe
Swiftech
Tones
||-More-||
 
 
OCZ Vertex Real-World Test Caught on Tape: SSD vs HDD
OCZ Vertex Real-World Test Caught on Tape: SSD vs HDD
While all those benchmark charts displaying 200+mb/s read and 150+mb/s write are impressive to see, it´s also good to actually have some idea of what that extra performance brings you in real life. We prepared two identical laptops with Windows 7 and Windows XP, one had a conventional HDD, the other a brand new OCZ Vertex SSD. The result is worth checking out.
Author jmke
Editor jmke
Date 2009-04-01
Discuss 29 comment(s)
Print this Article

 
 


  Introduction

I’ve been following the SSD scene for quite some time now, waiting for a good moment to step in and buy one for my own setup. When Intel launched their X25-M SSD and all review sites out there reported excellent performance, no matter what you threw at it, I came close to ordering one, but was put off by the high price per gigabyte.

OCZ has been on the frontline of more affordable SSD products from the get go with their Core series (v1/v2) which gave the masses SSD storage at an acceptable price; to get the best performance though you had to do a whole lot of system tweaking, reformatting, more tweaking and in the end you had a fast system, which might still act up from time to time.

Anybody considering buying an SSD should have read this excellent article by Anandtech by now, where they outline the strengths and weaknesses of current lower cost SSDs, the main culprit: the controller. The cheaper controller used in the entry level SSDs can cause severe performance dips when smaller file blocks are written and random I/O is performed; over time performance also degrades noticeable once the drive is completely full. Anandtech put different SSD through their paces, and while the Intel X25 reigns supreme, for the first time there is a new contender, the OCZ Vertex, which uses a new controller.

The OCZ Vertex still benefits from the multiple tweaks you can do to increase your system’s performance with SSDs, but it doesn’t rely on it to perform properly; it works just as well “plug & play” and this is a must for most users out there.

I bought a retail OCZ Vertex 30Gb drive for ~€164 (shipped) from MemoryC.com, not the cheapest out there storage device out there, the most expensive 2.5” drives are below that number; but it’s brand new tech and if you want to be the first, you pay the premium. It came shipped with firmware 1199, I flashed the drive to the latest release at this time 1275.

The Test

Last week I prepared two system images for a Dell Latitude D630, one with Windows 7 Beta and one with Windows XP, I also added Office 2007 and some other random applications, put them all in the startup menu; so I could just push the start button and see which system would finish the bootup cycle and loading up the complete Office 2007 suite (including a prepared Outlook 2007 with 1.2gb PST) first. AVG 8.5 was running in background in Windows 7, McAfee VSE 8.5 on XP.

Some of general SSD tweaks from OCZ forum posted here from XP and here for Vista were implemented, but not beyond the regedit tweaks and enabling “write cache” on the disk. Pagefile, hibernation file were left untouched, no ram drive configured. No SteadyState, no MFT. Those last two give major performance boost, but are far from plug & play; we’re looking at user-friendliness; regedit tweaks and an advanced control panel tab fall into that category.

The laptop system specs are not extraordinary, an Intel 2.2Ghz Dual Core CPU, 2GB RAM, one system had a stock Hitachi 7200rpm 80Gb HDD (which costs ~€40 in webshops), the other system features the OCZ Vertex SSD.

Windows 7 Startup

Here’s the outcome with Windows 7, note: the embed movie from youtube already has HD mode enabled, if you click the fullscreen button you can view the original 1280x720 HD source.



While all those benchmark charts displaying 200+mb/s read and 150+mb/s write are nice to see, it’s good to actually have some idea of what that performance brings you in real life, the SSD powered system is more than three times faster. On two identical systems you can do no other upgrade which will give you such a boost, even a 6.6Ghz CPU won’t overcome the HDD bottleneck. SSDs are the upgrade to consider in 2009, the performance boost is unbelievable.

Do note that we are using a laptop HDD, a very affordable one too, with a desktop 10.000rpm HDD the difference will be smaller, but raw access times and random write/read performance remains unmatched, multi-tasking is SSD territory and even the fastest convential HDDs lag behind here.

Onto Windows XP load times ->

| Next ->>




Quick Page Jump:

More reviews in this category can be found below:

  • SSD + Full Disk Encryption = Slow/Slower as HDD
  • Vizo Luxon 3.5Inch External IDE/SATA HDD Enclosure Review
  • Acard ANS-9010 RAMdisk vs OCZ Vertex 30Gb SSD: Shootout
  • HDD Upgrade Time: Acard ANS-9010 vs Gigabyte I-RAM vs SSD
  • Attack of the HDD Dockings: Sunbeamtech,Sharkoon,Thermaltake
  • OCZ Vertex Real-World Test Caught on Tape: SSD vs HDD
  • Western Digital Scorpio Black, the none-SSD Laptop HDD Upgrade
  • OCZ Rally2 32Gb USB Stick Review
  • Super Talent Pico-C 8Gb Micro USB Stick Review
  • Corsair Voyager GT 16Gb and Voyager 4Gb USB Stick Review
  •  
     

    Copyright © 2001-2006 Madshrimps / JMkeOC.com, All rights reserved.
    Graphical Design by Dennis Kestelle, Programming by John Meys, Paul Meys and Frederik Colardyn, Overall Site design by John Meys

    All information and graphics contained in Madshrimps are sole property of the Madshrimps crew and may not be reproduced or copied in any manner without written permission from us.

    BTW-BE 0888919678

    ADS by G
     
       
     

    Search Madshrimps
     
     
    Google
    Search Madshrimps:

     
     

    Daily News
     
      Geforce GT 240 gets...
    This one is for Fai...
    EVGA, where did you...
    Try Google's Chome ...
    The French Bench 13...
    Confirmed: R2-D2 Fi...
    Windows SteadyState...
    Cedarview Atom 2011...
    OCZ Plans USB 3.0 b...
    USB 3.0 vs USB 2.0 ...
    Sapphire Radeon HD ...
    CoolerMaster Sileo ...
    Lian Li Armorsuit P...
    OCZ DDR3 PC3-12800 ...
    Amd Athlon 2 X3 435...
    Sapphire Radeon HD ...
    Sapphire Radeon HD ...
    InWin Maelstrom Cas...
    ATI Radeon HD 5970 ...
    Elixir 6 GB 1600 MH...

    Syndicate Madshrimps Daily News with our XML/RSS Feed!

    Receive updates by e-mail

    Read more News...
     
     

    Sponsor Space:
     
     
     
     

    New Content
     
      Articles/Reviews:
    Sunbeamtech Automat...
    Leadtek Geforce GT ...
    Gigabyte TweaKING O...
    Video Card Comparis...
    Cooler Master Lab T...
    Leadtek Winfast Gef...
    SSD + Full Disk Enc...
    GIGABYTE P55-UD3P M...
    Vizo Luxon 3.5Inch ...
    Intel Core i7 CPU W...
    OCZ Behemoth Double...
    P55 Roundup: Gigaby...
    Intel Core i5 750 R...
    MSI MOA 2009 Grand ...
    F1 Overclocking Com...

    Howto and Guides:
    Building a 300W Fan...
    NVIDIA Geforce 8400...
    NVIDIA Geforce 8800...
    Reviving and Volt M...
    Protect the core of...